TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Really? I haven't played any of those three basses myself - I'd have a hard time telling which one is which.Hmmm, I don't know about that. I could play someone three Rush songs from Exit Stage Left, Grace Under Pressure, and Power Windows respectively that they have never heard before and I am 99% sure most bassists here would be able to point out which was the Rickenbacker, which was the Wal, and which was the Steinberger.
The same goes for a similar sample of Yes songs. Some basses are very easily identifiable.
Well, this just isn't true.Fenders are notorious for being well made and easy to put in the mix, as well as the fact that they're considered classic aesthetic and all that.
Ibanez feel like toys, and maybe not to everybody, but dollar for dollar, Fender is way more road worthy and their sound has much more oomph. Ibas usually sound very mid-cutty and that can be something you want. But fender p and j are both really ballsy and provide a lot of bite and tone that midscooped, active basses like iba are hard pressed to provide. Try and play what you like, cause that's what matters in the end.
But like anything, brands divide people. Sometimes for good reason.
I believe this lack of appreciation of Ibanez is perception rather than real experience. As an SR655 owner I have to say that it is a misconception. My bass is quality. Nordstrand pickups NEVER sound “poopie”. Mine punch as well as any Fender I’ve ever played with a broad tonal range. To be honest though, I have to say my ‘82 Musician doesn’t sound as good as my Precision of the same vintage or as good as the SR655.- I've just exchanged a very good lookin and sounding fender jazz mex (2008) with an Ibanez sr1300.
'Ibanez sounds poopie' is the most common thing I hear from people in general who probably are not used to different and more articulated sounds. - Have u ever played a high-end ibanez?
I can partly say the same thing for Yamaha,
Is it because they r Japanese and not American?
Has it something to do with tradition and visual customs? Powerful branding and marketing?
Ok, these questions are provocative but what are your thoughts about Ibanez' ostracising?
Nu-metal is solid stuff. I love me some Mudvayne, Slipknot, Sevendust... When my dad passed away, Slipknot's music is what kept my head right in the days following his passing. In particular their "Grey Chapters" album. Oh, and the first Korn album was pivotal in helping me survive high school. Metal elitists can scoff at Korn all they want, but they all effin' LOVED that first Korn album. Don't front!
As for Ibanez... I recall saying else where that Fender has little appeal to me. I find Fender and Fender-clone basses stodgy and old-fashioned in design and too ubiquitous. I'm a filthy hipster who prefers something different. However, I could easily say that Soundgears have been just as ubiquitous as Fenders in my own experience gigging, going to shows, etc. Yet, I would more likely check out a Soundgear over a Fender. I prefer the sleeker, racier, aesthetics of those basses. I'd be most curious to try out the Adam Nitti 5-string bass or the SR2405W, since they have the 45mm nut width I like, but with 18mm string spacing at the bridge.
Fenders are notorious for being well made and easy to put in the mix, as well as the fact that they're considered classic aesthetic and all that.
Ibanez feel like toys, and maybe not to everybody, but dollar for dollar, Fender is way more road worthy and their sound has much more oomph. Ibas usually sound very mid-cutty and that can be something you want. But fender p and j are both really ballsy and provide a lot of bite and tone that midscooped, active basses like iba are hard pressed to provide. Try and play what you like, cause that's what matters in the end.
But like anything, brands divide people. Sometimes for good reason.
- This is a kinda generic topic (no trolls plz) - but
I am a beginner/intermediate player (4 years of bass studies, long time ago) and I have begun playing the bass again during quarantine.
I've just exchanged a very good lookin and sounding fender jazz mex (2008) with an Ibanez sr1300.
I don't want to disappoint all the Fender adherents here but these are instruments at different levels.
Even though the Jazz sounds great, it is just that, and that's it. Ok, long life to simplicity but once I came across this Ibanez (fine wooded, NS pickupped, multidimensionally equalised, agile and good looking). I thougth: 'how it is possible that people do not even take into consideration this bass, if not for live performance, at least for studio recs or experimentation?'.
'Ibanez sounds poopie' is the most common thing I hear from people in general who probably are not used to different and more articulated sounds. - Have u ever played a high-end ibanez?
I can partly say the same thing for Yamaha,
Is it because they r Japanese and not American?
Has it something to do with tradition and visual customs? Powerful branding and marketing?
Is it because most of bass playing and sounding has been very standard since the beginning of rock-blues and the bass is still forced within these limits?
Ok, these questions are provocative but what are your thoughts about Ibanez' ostracising?
I play mostly 5-string basses (right now, I only own 5’s - four of them).
Most Ibanez 5’s have narrow 16.5mm string spacing, which I don’t like.
The only Ibanez 5 I would buy is the Cerro single cut with 18mm string spacing. I played that bass and loved it.
(Stole this photo from TB classifieds)
View attachment 3928254
the BTB’s have 19mm spacing, but I really don’t like the body shape and it’s straight-cut angles.