I do appreciate ibanez willing to try different concepts and put them into production
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I was very happy for years, with my SDGR 5, then my wife bought me a Bubinga Warwick Corvette and the Ibanez hasn't left the house since. Maybe I should explain. The Ibanez feels great, but it sounds a little thin. You can hear the difference when you pluck a string without amplification. The Warwicks have more 'body'.- This is a kinda generic topic (no trolls plz) - but
I am a beginner/intermediate player (4 years of bass studies, long time ago) and I have begun playing the bass again during quarantine.
I've just exchanged a very good lookin and sounding fender jazz mex (2008) with an Ibanez sr1300.
I don't want to disappoint all the Fender adherents here but these are instruments at different levels.
Even though the Jazz sounds great, it is just that, and that's it. Ok, long life to simplicity but once I came across this Ibanez (fine wooded, NS pickupped, multidimensionally equalised, agile and good looking). I thougth: 'how it is possible that people do not even take into consideration this bass, if not for live performance, at least for studio recs or experimentation?'.
'Ibanez sounds poopie' is the most common thing I hear from people in general who probably are not used to different and more articulated sounds. - Have u ever played a high-end ibanez?
I can partly say the same thing for Yamaha,
Is it because they r Japanese and not American?
Has it something to do with tradition and visual customs? Powerful branding and marketing?
Is it because most of bass playing and sounding has been very standard since the beginning of rock-blues and the bass is still forced within these limits?
Ok, these questions are provocative but what are your thoughts about Ibanez' ostracising?
I once heard a guy snidely ask the bassist why he played Japanese crap.
Ibby has the widest range of tone
I think to a lot of people Ibanez = soundgear. Which is silly. I have a soundgear and a BTB. Vastly different.
The only ones around my area are the lower end basses.
looking forward to a read about that brand whose bases I don't know much about.
it's been the neck - people either don't like the more narrow string spacing, think the neck is too thin, or both.
I don’t like the way they look, (a bit too boring and thin bodied, or too pointy) or active pickups,
Totally agree. Plus, the Brits have done as much for Rock music as Americans, if not more (Beatles, Led Zeppellin, The Who, and many others).I disagree with the notion that one should play an "authentic-looking" instrument in order to be an "authentic" player in certain musical genres. Appearances are superficial, and as long as you like how an instrument feels and plays, the aesthetic aspects are purely superficial.
I suppose the only exceptions would be if your instrument's pickups could not produce the desired tones, or if you are playing in a tribute band that tries to mimic the exact look of the original musicians you're imitating. Otherwise, it is strictly surface cosmetics.
Taken to an extreme, this same attitude could lead someone to say that only Black musicians can play Blues or Jazz authentically, and only White musicians should play Country or Classical music — which would be absurd, unnecessarily restrictive, boring, and even insulting to anyone who did not match such criteria.
I know this is off topic, but I just wanted to say that Carol Kaye might honestly believe that it's her playing on those records. It was not uncommon for Motown producers to re-record the same songs with other musicians. I've read a Bob Babbit column in BP magazine years ago where he told the story about how James Jamersonthought that he (Jamerson) played on a song Babbit also recorded and was given credit for (I hope I'm not mistaken, I don't have the said magazine in front of me).Carol Kaye is lying when she says she played on classic Jamerson tracks. She played a P with flats for most of those tracks, too.
This was not supposed to be an anti-fender post. I am just asking if it is possible that in some cases Ibanez makes basses that are at the same level or even better than Fender. And that even peers - musicians are skeptical about this.
*in my case I exchanged a jazz mex 2008 with an ibanez sr1300
Your post is very surprising to me as someone who knows, and has known, plenty of hipsters.Nu-metal is solid stuff. I love me some Mudvayne, Slipknot, Sevendust... When my dad passed away, Slipknot's music is what kept my head right in the days following his passing. In particular their "Grey Chapters" album. Oh, and the first Korn album was pivotal in helping me survive high school. Metal elitists can scoff at Korn all they want, but they all effin' LOVED that first Korn album. Don't front!
As for Ibanez... I recall saying else where that Fender has little appeal to me. I find Fender and Fender-clone basses stodgy and old-fashioned in design and too ubiquitous. I'm a filthy hipster who prefers something different. However, I could easily say that Soundgears have been just as ubiquitous as Fenders in my own experience gigging, going to shows, etc. Yet, I would more likely check out a Soundgear over a Fender. I prefer the sleeker, racier, aesthetics of those basses. I'd be most curious to try out the Adam Nitti 5-string bass or the SR2405W, since they have the 45mm nut width I like, but with 18mm string spacing at the bridge.
I'm in my mid 30s. Today's 20yo millennials are broke unemployed cry babies who aren't buying much.
I can be contrarian for the sake of it as well... unfortunately my family has chosen a different (profane) adjective rather than “hipster” to describe my behaviorIn terms of semantics, I was using the term "hipster" to describe the mentality I sometimes have of being contrarian simply for the sake of being contrarian. Or within the TalkBass community where the dominant love is "P-bass with flats and tort" my tastes run counter to that. Ergo, using the catch-all term "hipster" as a "dare-to-be-different" TalkBass contrarian.
My two instruments are a modded LTD F-Series artist signature model and a modded Carvin SB5000. No GAS, but I wouldn't mind putting my hands around an Ibanez BTB. Something a little different from the Soundgear norm.
I'm 42. Too young to be Gen-X, too old to be a Millennial. I'm generation-fluid, yeah!

I agree Click Clack. You make very good points. But I still think a lot of people feel this way whether it makes sense or not.I disagree with the notion that one should play an "authentic-looking" instrument in order to be an "authentic" player in certain musical genres. Appearances are superficial, and as long as you like how an instrument feels and plays, the aesthetic aspects are purely superficial.
I suppose the only exceptions would be if your instrument's pickups could not produce the desired tones, or if you are playing in a tribute band that tries to mimic the exact look of the original musicians you're imitating. Otherwise, it is strictly surface cosmetics.
Taken to an extreme, this same attitude could lead someone to say that only Black musicians can play Blues or Jazz authentically, and only White musicians should play Country or Classical music — which would be absurd, unnecessarily restrictive, boring, and even insulting to anyone who did not match such criteria.
Cosmetic it’s a visual experience and we are talking about music so every body, use your earsI agree Click Clack. You make very good points. But I still think a lot of people feel this way whether it makes sense or not.