• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

What's Wrong with Scooping the Mids?

I thought the mid cut was explained by the Fletcher–Munson curves. If I understand it right people perceive the mids as being exaggerated at low volumes as this is where the ear is most sensitive. Boosting the bass and highs (scooping) corrects the perceived fall off of the lows and highs at these low volumes. I've only recently started looking deeper into this subject as I dabble in dealing with analyzing acoustical response curves in a bad room.
 
I thought the mid cut was explained by the Fletcher–Munson curves. If I understand it right people perceive the mids as being exaggerated at low volumes as this is where the ear is most sensitive. Boosting the bass and highs (scooping) corrects the perceived fall off of the lows and highs at these low volumes. I've only recently started looking deeper into this subject as I dabble in dealing with analyzing acoustical response curves in a bad room.

You are correct.
The problem of "bedroom tone," complete with graphs, is explained here:
20 years playing bass and never thought about volume!

Scooping mids sounds great when you're practicing at low volume, so go ahead and scoop.
But at gig volumes your tone will tend to be muddy, and at recording sessions you'll tend to get lost in the mix.

These are rules of thumb, not laws of nature!
Mixing, for instance, is all about giving each instrument its own space.
An upright bass has little midrange, but a jazz combo doesn't have distorted guitars competing for mids.
A Jamerson-style P-bass with old dead flats has little midrange, but again, he's not competing with distorted guitars.
And so on.
 
I'm not well acquainted with the amps forum, so bear with me here.

I was trying out the sample settings in the Mesa WD-800's manual today with a drum track and my favourite with my Precision and Jazz was: bass at 1, passive mid at 9 and treble at 11.

Now, when I started playing bass in the early 2000s, mid-scooping was all the rage, at least in acid jazz, jazz fusion, funk and funk rock.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I feel like mid-scooping has since fell out of favour. I'm worried I've become a product of my time, like how James Jamerson was left behind in the 70s because he refused to switch his Precision strung with flats for an active bass with rounds. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but I'm wondering why mid-scooping fell out of favour. Am I missing something?

did you mean bass at 11?

anyway you are competing with more synths than ever before now and people want a fat bass sound, which equates to having low mids in the sound now. Plus its a fantastic tone in a good mix.
 
Nathan East has made a career out of having a mid-shy tone. First with his "Magic Box", and later with the circuit embedded in his namesake basses. Chuck Rainey over the years has also dialled back his midrange on his active basses. In his words, it keeps his bass from sounding "too nerdy" heh.

The original poster is right, big mids are the sound of the day. Don't care for it myself. But tastes vary and that is ok. I think the midrange-heavy tones of today are why people can play all kinds of gigs these days with a 1x15. You don't need a lot of gear to get a mid heavy tone.

I love Nathan East's tone. it's smooth and pleasant to the ear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: honeydorick
I'm not well acquainted with the amps forum, so bear with me here.

I was trying out the sample settings in the Mesa WD-800's manual today with a drum track and my favourite with my Precision and Jazz was: bass at 1, passive mid at 9 and treble at 11.

Now, when I started playing bass in the early 2000s, mid-scooping was all the rage, at least in acid jazz, jazz fusion, funk and funk rock.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I feel like mid-scooping has since fell out of favour. I'm worried I've become a product of my time, like how James Jamerson was left behind in the 70s because he refused to switch his Precision strung with flats for an active bass with rounds. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but I'm wondering why mid-scooping fell out of favour. Am I missing something?
It's only out of flavor among bass players. Everybody else in the music world, scoops bass mids. Producers, engineers, and everybody in your band. It's called "the mix" for a reason. You play bass. Bass needs to fit in the mix, with everybody else. Not be the only thing you hear, and sound honky, nasally, and un-felt.

But, to hear yourself, and not drown people out, in a live band setting, you needs mids, and tamed lows. It's a constant battle between boom, room, and volume.
 
I'm not well acquainted with the amps forum, so bear with me here.

I was trying out the sample settings in the Mesa WD-800's manual today with a drum track and my favourite with my Precision and Jazz was: bass at 1, passive mid at 9 and treble at 11.

Now, when I started playing bass in the early 2000s, mid-scooping was all the rage, at least in acid jazz, jazz fusion, funk and funk rock.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I feel like mid-scooping has since fell out of favour. I'm worried I've become a product of my time, like how James Jamerson was left behind in the 70s because he refused to switch his Precision strung with flats for an active bass with rounds. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but I'm wondering why mid-scooping fell out of favour. Am I missing something?
Too many people back then were scooping too many mids and falling out of dense mixes to the point they couldn't hear themselves, including me. Nowadays I just use a gentle cut and keep the mids stronger. But major mid scooping has its place and shouldn't always be thought of as a bad thing.
 
My particular bass has a very honky, mid-heavy tone, to the point where I don't like the tone and neither does anybody else (complaints of "the bass is all can hear"). So I give the low mids a mild scoop in order to bring them more in line with the lows and highs. This is the best way I've found to be heard, particularly in a guitar-heavy mix. It comes through, but not too much.