• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

When do you think a matching headstock does not look good?

Not a lot of love here for maple and matching, but I don't think my Jake would look nearly as nice with a plain maple headstock.

IMG_7537.jpg
 
Initially I didn't like any of them. But over time they kinda grew on me. But it does depend on the bass. Some it works with, while others look unfinished if it isn't. Heres some examples. Now that P bass looks great. But when you stick it next to the Vintage II and Stingray the headstock looks unfinished. Yet if it were painted I'd probably think it was "odd".... That G&L doesn't take pictures well, but its stunning in person - headstock and all.
 

Attachments

  • White Nite.pdf
    White Nite.pdf
    656.8 KB · Views: 19
  • IMG_1921.JPG
    IMG_1921.JPG
    423.3 KB · Views: 20
Hadn't actually thought about it until now, but I'm pretty sure that not a single one of my 9 basses has a "matching" headstock as described here. So it must not be something I'm attracted to. Now, that having been said, a couple of those basses have the headstock finished the same way as the body and neck in a uniform wood or enamel finish, and four of those basses are headless. :)
 
When do you think a matching headstock does not look good on a bass?
well, i know when i see it! ;) :laugh: :roflmao:

seriously, i like about all of the matching headstocks i see, in this thread and in the real world. it's not the first thing i think about or notice, but i think headstocks are great with a match, and great without. i'm not as fired up about it as some apparently are....but i harbor no grudges, nor any ill will! :laugh: