- Mar 19, 2013
- 1,612
- 2,694
- Disclosures
- If only I were that good....
I think you mean tunewood.
Oh geez.....now we have another topic to debate affect of tone by woods.....
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I think you mean tunewood.
I actually specialize in those...Has a certain “earthy” flavor to it. Just my opinion here, there’s such a thing as great execution of a bad idea.
I was musing on the arbitrary primacy of clover-shaped tuners the other day also. Why wouldn’t this be a reasonable design?
View attachment 3216331
Hey, I know a girl who has that bass and she loves it.... oh. Nevermind.Not my thing, but on the other hand, I respect individuality most of the time, so I give it a Thumbs Up.
I’ve rather have that than this:
View attachment 3216528
057912
Too Squeaky?I was musing on the arbitrary primacy of clover-shaped tuners the other day also. Why wouldn’t this be a reasonable design?
View attachment 3216331
Inlay needs to be tort to match the pick guard![]()

I had a K car and nothing about it was a nice as these tuners.Just because I don’t know what they are doesn’t stop me from thinking they came out of a 1986 Reliant K-car.
Am I the only one who thinks the usual butterfly tuners look utterly ridiculous?
I was musing on the arbitrary primacy of clover-shaped tuners the other day also. Why wouldn’t this be a reasonable design?
View attachment 3216331