• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Where are the 51-56 single coil precision basses?

Having owned a '71 Tele Bass for many years - which is in most respects a replica of the original "P" - these are my recollections:

1) Heavy? It all depends on what one compares them with. Against a Hofner Beatle Bass or my '69 Gibson EB-0, sure they are. When compared to most of the late 70s Fenders, they are featherweights.

2) Telephone pole...lol. Yes, these came with traditional "C" necks - at least all the ones that I've ever come across - so the necks are indeed on the chunky side.

3) Noisy...not in my experience, and I've done a good bit of recording - on the analog equipment no less - with mine back in the days.

I'd love to see an re-issue of a '51 P - or for that fact '68 Tele - in Fender's U.S. AVRI lineup, but somehow I don't believe that's going to happen.

Good post. Just a couple of mitigating factors. At the time I was playing an (yak) EB3 short scale and I could fly on it, and it had humbuckers on it. Going from that to playing a Fender was like switching from driving a Volkswagen Beetle to driving the Queen Mary. It may be the Fender bases I played were not in the greatest shape. Thanks for your post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SwitchGear
"Never thought of scpb reissues as an investment."

Me neither. I bought my ‘51 mostly for the tonal variation the SC pup offered, and all the mods I described earlier were done to enhance its utility. It is a quality instrument and hopefully will retain its value, but I don’t consider it a collectible and no one will ever confuse it with an original ’51.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SwitchGear
the what now ???
mi5zMEC.jpg
 
Many of us totally agree with you! Bring on affordable single coil P Basses! The Fender MIJs of a few years back were excellent and affordable, a blonde '51 slab, a 2 tone '51 slab and the Sting Bass (12th fret marker YUCK!).

Other choice is to buy a single coil style Warmoth body and neck and build one for about $800.

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed
 
Last edited:
I suppose these are kind of an acquired taste. i have an original '56 and it is amazing. Also Pre CBS P basses, Jazz Basses Old Kay and Silvertones... The Single coil is very loud and bright. Different than a P or J. Maybe they are not popular reissues because people aren't expecting this tone but I love it. Most of my basses are Rosewood, this is obviously maple and there for is noticeably more sustain. This may sound counter-intuitive but when you roll ALL the tone off it is as fat and punchy as any bass I have ever played. The one drawback is it's super clean and not the sort of thing I would take on the road or (god forbid) a club gig. I have an '82 57 reissue (referred to as fullerton reissues) that is a giant killer. Totally amazing and not so valuable that I can't take it with me to any gig.
 

Attachments

  • 1956 Fender Bass.jpg
    1956 Fender Bass.jpg
    125.9 KB · Views: 35
Is the pot Volume or Tone or...?
...and what are the materials for body and neck?
That is a V control on a Warmoth SSB SC . The top is birds eye Maple . The back is Mahogany .The Burst was done by TB'er Paul Slagle aka: Mister Nobody / Pittman guitars . The neck is a 32" Warhead in Ziricote w / Ebony board . The pup is a Duncan custom Stinger . It's a bad little thing .

kHVq60l.jpg


okdiHtF.jpg


KAdngSh.jpg



b0VwEmM.jpg


VB34t1B.jpg
 
Last edited:
Do you have a preference, coated or bare?
I've had both, and like different things about them. My current fretless jazz has a poly finish on the fretboard. I'm happy with it.
I'd go non coated.
But then...I'd also most likely have a Brazilian Rosewood board(again).
Even if I went with maple, I don't think I'd mind it changing it's appearance over time.
 

Latest posts