TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
BONGO: EBMM Bongo HH, both pickups, EQ flat
L-2000: US G&L L-2000, both pickups, single coil, passive
SQUIER: Squier VM 70's Jazz with Basslines SJB-2, both pickups wide open
LAKLAND: Lakland Skyline DJ4 both pickups wide open
STERLING: EBMM Sterling HS, both pickups, EQ flat
I guess the point of this is not to say bass X is better than bass Y, but rather to ask the question if a bass that we think has a particular signature tone is really that distinguishable from another. Does it really matter or make a difference?
Last two are EBMMs, I say the Squier is C. Other two are toss ups.
I didn't post guesses, because I don't agree with the methodology.
1) Different strings - even if they're the same brand and gauge, different age plays a (sometimes huge) role, as pointed out.
2) Both pups on full and flat EQ is the best scientific method for approching this, yes, however, I don't believe a jazz's "signature tone" is done by both pups full blast and flat EQ. Same with all the others.
Also, it's relativly east to make all of these basses sound similar, as I'm a firm believer that a good portion of "tone" comes from the player, as much as the instrument and such.
But that's me.
these types of threads are for fun, why do people get so scientific?
by the way... am I right!?
By the way, what's the prize for the winner?
We're all shallower than we think.
Um. Can you tell me the answer now?
People don't have this kind of attention span anymore