• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Which Song Introduced Grunge To The Mainstream?

Which Grunge Tune?

  • Nirvana, "Smells Like Teen Spirit"

    Votes: 150 93.8%
  • Pearl Jam, "Even Flow"

    Votes: 4 2.5%
  • Smashing Pumpkins, "Cherub Rock"

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Soundgarden, "Spoonman"

    Votes: 2 1.3%
  • Other - write-in

    Votes: 4 2.5%

  • Total voters
    160
See, when I think "pioneering grunge band" I think Mudhoney or Screaming Trees or Nirvana, not Soundgarden.

I have to think of bands like Skinyard and Greenriver as being the fathers of grunge. I remember being very surprised that Nirvana was the band to break out first. I allways thought it would of been Soundgarden to break first. Man those were very bizzare days in a lot of ways especially after Never mind broke and the labels decided to sign a lot of bands around here. I have friends still paying off the IRS for taxes on the advances the labels gave out.

If I remember correctly Soundgarden didn't break sooner because they had the forethought to holdout from the labels for a reasonable deal for quite a long time.

I think 17 years of having every music critic in the world telling us Cobain was a genius far ahead of his time has clouded history a bit.

Smells like teen spirit was no doubt a huge hit, but it was released in 91 and by then Alice in Chains was already opening for the Monsters of Rock Tour...and a lot of people I knew were already big fans of Soundgarden from Louder than Love and Ultramega OK--which was nominated for a Grammy in 1989 I think.

I guess it depends on what "mainstream fans" are described as. If its people who took their love for "grunge" and moved on to bands like Collective Soul and Bush 'cause they got good slots on MTV and Curt Louder told they should like 'em...then sure Nirvana was the first "mainstream" grunge band. If you're talking about music fans that actually payed attention to stuff that wasn't on the mainstream media's rotation twenty times a day, then Nirvana was just one of a bunch of bands that got popular at or around the same time.
 
If I remember correctly Soundgarden didn't break sooner because they had the forethought to holdout from the labels for a reasonable deal for quite a long time.

I think 17 years of having every music critic in the world telling us Cobain was a genius far ahead of his time has clouded history a bit.

Smells like teen spirit was no doubt a huge hit, but it was released in 91 and by then Alice in Chains was already opening for the Monsters of Rock Tour...and a lot of people I knew were already big fans of Soundgarden from Louder than Love and Ultramega OK--which was nominated for a Grammy in 1989 I think.

I guess it depends on what "mainstream fans" are described as. If its people who took their love for "grunge" and moved on to bands like Collective Soul and Bush 'cause they got good slots on MTV and Curt Louder told they should like 'em...then sure Nirvana was the first "mainstream" grunge band. If you're talking about music fans that actually payed attention to stuff that wasn't on the mainstream media's rotation twenty times a day, then Nirvana was just one of a bunch of bands that got popular at or around the same time.

Talk about beating a topic to death......

Mainstream or not Nirvana Owns GRUNGE.... you can't deny this.

Personally i think the "Grunge" movement started with bands like the pixies and jesus lizard, etc. in the late 80's and then Died (to me anyways) with Kurt Cobain.

Soundgarden became alt. rock along with alice n chains and everyone else.

BUT just to be honest to everyone I was more TOOL and NIN fan than a Nirvana....
 
i remember with my hazy brain when grunge was just an adjective used to describe some really rough 1960's garage rock from the pacific northwest on the back of a compilation of such music. then 20-30 years later there were bands like mudhoney, tad who were sort of doing the modern equivalent; not in a retro fashion of apeing the genre, but just playing raw rock n roll with modern gear but with that same attitude and sonic filth. and then nirvana started to become popular, someone (scott from the young fresh fellows maybe?) suggested to eddie vedder he should try singing like they guy out of blood sweat and tears, and then countless other bands sprouted up or tailored their sound to do that whole dreadful "underbite rock" thing, and it became a fashion thing and it was all just very depressing. if anyone should have been megastars, no one deserved it more than the fastbacks, who weren't part of that whole aesthetic and trend, but were there well before it started, were better than everyone else, and kept going after the seattle craze died down. thank goodness kurt bloch never sold out and kept doing what he does best to this very day.
 
Well, post-punk music kind of evolved into this depressed mixture of punk, metal, and the cure, and that's what I meant by my post. It's like they took little bits of certain genres of music, mixed them all together, watched Old Yeller and got depressed. After that they wrote some music.

Nice description!! :D
 
Nobody's going to write in Neil Young...geesh.

Seriously though, Pearl Jam was definitely the first one on my radar. _Ten_ came out just before my junior year in high school and it was just everywhere. Then I was a sophomore in college when _Vs._ came out I remember being in line to buy it at midnight, then that was everywhere.

In the grand scheme though it was almost certainly Nirvana that brought the Seattle Sound to the wider population. Though I never did like them as much as Pearl Jam, and the whole Cobain=Messiah thing is getting a bit old.
 
Nobody's going to write in Neil Young...geesh.

Seriously though, Pearl Jam was definitely the first one on my radar. _Ten_ came out just before my junior year in high school and it was just everywhere. Then I was a sophomore in college when _Vs._ came out I remember being in line to buy it at midnight, then that was everywhere.

In the grand scheme though it was almost certainly Nirvana that brought the Seattle Sound to the wider population. Though I never did like them as much as Pearl Jam, and the whole Cobain=Messiah thing is getting a bit old.
A big ole +1 to all that.

You mention Cobaine's death and everyone's all ooooohhhhh.... You mention Layne Staley's, and they are like "who?". It's sad really.
 
Alice In Chains: Man In The Box
I'd say this song.

I got out of the Army in June of 1991. I auditioned for a cover band in either Aug or Sept- and "Man In The Box" was one of the songs I had to audition with. I hadn't heard it (but knew of AIC), but then again I was in kind of a bubble.

If you remove the "grunge" stipulation and the "mainstream" stipulation- the first band, for me, that was part of that whole "new sound the kids are digging" was the Smashing Pumpkins. Some friends had seen them in the summer of 91, and I had Gish before summer was over. I saw the Pumpkins in a record store in Sept of 91 and had Billy and James sign the back insert of my CD.

If I remember correctly Soundgarden didn't break sooner because they had the forethought to holdout from the labels for a reasonable deal for quite a long time.

I think 17 years of having every music critic in the world telling us Cobain was a genius far ahead of his time has clouded history a bit.

Smells like teen spirit was no doubt a huge hit, but it was released in 91 and by then Alice in Chains was already opening for the Monsters of Rock Tour...and a lot of people I knew were already big fans of Soundgarden from Louder than Love and Ultramega OK--which was nominated for a Grammy in 1989 I think.

I guess it depends on what "mainstream fans" are described as. If its people who took their love for "grunge" and moved on to bands like Collective Soul and Bush 'cause they got good slots on MTV and Curt Louder told they should like 'em...then sure Nirvana was the first "mainstream" grunge band. If you're talking about music fans that actually payed attention to stuff that wasn't on the mainstream media's rotation twenty times a day, then Nirvana was just one of a bunch of bands that got popular at or around the same time.

Re-read what was written and the premise of the thread.

"Which song introduced grunge to the mainstream."

The "mainstream" is not music fans that pay attention to things. That's still in a niche. While I believe AIC had a higher profile than any other "punk" influenced band to that point, they were by no means "mainstream." By that point, metal couldn't be considered "mainstream."

To me, it changed when you had a radio station playing stuff like Color Me Badd, Taylor Dane, Rick Ghastly and Paula Abdul and then playing "Smells Like..." THAT'S mainstream. THAT'S where it changed.
 
Teen Spirit, without a doubt. (Even though Touch Me, I'm Sick should've been a huge hit.)

But as far as first Grunge Band goes...

Blue Cheer?
Loud as balls, sludgy, grungy, minimal skill...

But as far as Seattle goes, The Melvins. It's a crime this thread got three pages in before they got mentioned. The Melvins were the first grunge band, period.
 
There is no debate. "Teen Spirit" was definitely the song that brought grunge to the masses. However, Mudhoney, Green River, Screaming Trees, and other bands brought grunge to Nirvana.

I was actually an emo junkie, before it was called emo back in '94. I was into bands like Samiam, All, Jaw Breaker, Fugazi, etc. A few years later I found out that all these bands went to major labels and thus the whole "emo" thing was birthed. I was devastated since I thought all that stuff was for us skateboarders, not a bunch of depressed suburban boys wearing girl's pants.

fugazi was never and never will be on a major label. Dischord is owned by Ian MacKaye himself. The whole "neo emo" thing was birthed way after all of those bands' hey day. Even when Jimmy Eat World was on independent labels much later than the bands you mentioned the word "emo" didn't become mainstream. If anything it's more that all these later bands just listened to JEW and The Get-Up Kids, took modern goth fashion, and just went from there.

Back then it was a derogatory term and no band wanted to be called emo. Now it's a derogatory term, but not in the same way. Many of those bands, and their fanbases, like being called emo. They just needed a term for all those eyeliner wearing pansies. The stuff that gets called emo today sounds more like watered down pop punk more than what was called emo back then. There isn't much of a connection between Moss Icon and Rites of Spring, the two bands often considered the progenitors of emo, with these later bands.
 
Even when Jimmy Eat World was on independent labels much later than the bands you mentioned the word "emo" didn't become mainstream. If anything it's more that all these later bands just listened to JEW and The Get-Up Kids, took modern goth fashion, and just went from there.

Back then it was a derogatory term and no band wanted to be called emo. Now it's a derogatory term, but not in the same way. Many of those bands, and their fanbases, like being called emo. They just needed a term for all those eyeliner wearing pansies.
Really? Name one major band that actually likes being called "emo". I certainly haven't heard of one.
 
you younger players might want to listen to Blue Cheer from the 60's, throw in a few jazz chords and turnarounds ala George Harrison and a few moving 5th Sabbath runs and a touch of Neil Young...

please, grunge was already in the mainstream it just faded and returned with nirvana in a watered down rehashed formula
 
What about "Loud Love" ...one of Soundgarden's better tunes and it came out in 1989.

I loved that whole album! (I think the album title was Louder Than Love). Hands All Over was my favourite track.

Pre Ben Shepherd too, Hiro Yamamoto I think played bass on that one.

On topic, I voted Teen Spirit. Thats the tune that broke grunge to the masses, absolutely no doubt.
 
Really? Name one major band that actually likes being called "emo". I certainly haven't heard of one.

I'm sure several of them didn't mind at first. The term "emo" for these later bands was originally used by its fanbase, who I'm sure did not mean so in a derogatory fashion. Even though the term was derogatory to begin with, it eventually was used as a descriptive term for certain bands during the 90s without all the hate attached to it. Read any Maximum Rock n Roll or Punk Planet during that era and you'll see emo used most of the time as just a regular, descriptive term. When the zines first coined the term emo it was definitely in a derogatory fashion. It was certainly a dig at what bands like Rites of Spring were doing. The term just gained enough acceptance in the 90s for bands to not mind as much. Then it became associated with bands like My Chemical Romance and Fall Out Boy, and suddenly the term gained mainstream notoriety outside of punk circles and sadly became associated with those bands and those fans. Now people outside of those circles associate emo with said bands and fans and use it in a derogatory fashion again.
 

Latest posts