• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Who's Your Favorite Custom Builder???

I'll chime in with another vote for Alembic. I love the looks, sound and feel of my Alembic Dragon Wing...
a4989fb4-13de-4976-8b75-41ecb82056e7_zps84216725.jpg


Followed closely by Pedulla and Spector of course.
 
Double-reverse-P alert! Detailed impressions, please, if you feel it appropriate to do so here. (My main player is a reverse-P/J, FWIW.) Curious about this beast.

Not actually a double reverse P.

The two middle coils are a normal P pickup. The second P pickup is spilt do the D&G coils are in front (on the neck side) and the E&A coils are behind (on the bridge side) and the blend control blends the inner coils (standard P) with the outer coils.
 
Not actually a double reverse P.

The two middle coils are a normal P pickup. The second P pickup is spilt do the D&G coils are in front (on the neck side) and the E&A coils are behind (on the bridge side) and the blend control blends the inner coils (standard P) with the outer coils.

Holy crap I can't imagine what that sounds like.
 
Not actually a double reverse P.

The two middle coils are a normal P pickup. The second P pickup is spilt do the D&G coils are in front (on the neck side) and the E&A coils are behind (on the bridge side) and the blend control blends the inner coils (standard P) with the outer coils.

Okay, on first reading, that seemed bizarre, but I think I see the logic behind it: A regular P sounds cool, but there is a noticeable difference going from the loose-sounding E/A coil to the tighter sounding D/G coil. A reverse P tightens up the low strings and smooths that transition out, but it's still there and, arguably, you lose a bit of the classic P-vibe. This would let you keep that while gradually blending in a much tighter-sounding coil on the low strings and a much warmer-sounding coil on the high strings. Still, I'd have to see/hear/touch/play it myself! Really intriguing -- any clips, Fuzzbass? Seems like you could wire this up to switch between the configuration described above and the double-reverse-P I mentioned. Whether that would offer any advantage or not, I don't know. Cool idea, for sure!

Thanks for the clarification, Jared.
 
Benevente , conklin, or warwick. Tonally i want something similar to my old warwick thumb nt but in a bolt on. But i do like the better balance of the conklins(no neck dive and the erb options of benevente and conklin. I saw a benevente DCD with sunburst and tort gaurd an thought it was the nicest looking bass I've seen yet. Great marriage of classic meets modern. If i went warwick id probably go for a different body shape than the thumb but similar woods and pickup location and electronics of the thumb nt to try to get that sound in a better balanced instrument.
 

Latest posts