I think the older Steinys and old graphite basses have a distinct tone. Some dislike it and refer to it as cold. Some like the clarity however.
Modulus have a nice tone. You can fix any of the colder tone issues with a good pre amp or foot pedal board.
Status basses are really nice. A bit colder than Modulus, more like the old Steiny's, but more updated tonal and electronics I'd say.
Zon is in a different class and here's why: his necks are NOT graphite, they are composite. They offer the same benefits but not as cold. They have their own unique sound.
The above basses do not change when the weather changes.
I've also NEVER had to redo a neck or adjust them much at all.
Wood necks? Maybe a dozen I've had the displeasure of owning over the years. I'm over picky? No, not as much as other players I've met.
I like each bass I pick up to have a different sound and purpose. I do not want them to all sound the same.
The Kubicki ex Factor has a nice set up with the 1/16th inch laminates. This still has many of the characters of a graphite type neck, but has a nice tone and warmth. The neck will still bow, but not nearly as much. And the Truss is VERY easy to access and adjust.
I'm curious as to why that type of wood neck design is not more popular.
Modulus, Zon, and status to some degree all use wood tonal bodies these days, but a few have the full neck thru graphite designs.
All wood basses are hit or miss as far as that perfect tone. Some are simple epic basses, if.........you are lucky. Will they stay that way? Hopefully.
Graphite or composites? They are not going anywhere.
Yes, they do cost more than wood, but they are far cheaper than Alembics, Fodera, Ritters etc.
I had a single cut maple Redeemer that one of the best sounding and nicest low action or any bass I've ever owned.
And it was reasonable in price.
You can find the perfect bass, but you have to look and try many.