• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why aren't Jaguar basses more popular?

not enuff strings or frets for me personally. but has balls. .... good tone. meat. greasy beef. jag 6 string 24 frets would rule, but then the shape would have to change. to access the upper frets.
 
Forgive me if this has already been posted:

Most sales people don't take the time to learn what all the buttons and knobs are, so that slows down sales.

As far as looks, that is subjective... I'm in between...
 
I own one- just got it as a Christmas gift. Give it a couple more years and they may seem a bit more common-place. The offbeat appearance isn't for everyone, though.

Mine's a factory refurb or second (stamped "USED" on the back of the headstock.) It took a minor truss rod turn and a little bridge adjustment to make it mine, but I have to say, I was shocked at how well it plays. Probably the best of any Fender I've gotten new (I've bought 4 or 5 new Fenders over the years.)

The electronics are a downside that could limit the popularity of the bass.

1) The buzz is real and is loud, BUT... this is a very bright bass, IMHO. Roll the tone knob off to a reasonable level, and the buzz isn't a big deal at all.
2) No pickup blend. Just on-off toggles for each pickup. VVT would be more flexible, but then you've got a jazz bass, I guess.
3) The preamp isn't the best. Set flat, it doesn't do much to alter the tone of the bass, which I think is a good thing. The bass boost gets out of hand after more than a quarter turn, and I can't imagine why you'd boost the treble on a bass this bright (think L2000 in treble boost mode X 10000!).

Despite the JJ pickups, I think Fender managed to make something that wasn't a jazz bass in both looks and tone. I do think they'd get a lot further a lot faster if they improved the quality of the electronics. Like maybe making the pre boost/cut with a center detent rather than boost only. And by fixing what some here have called a five minute grounding fix.

When you first plug it in, it buzzes like crazy, and if the preamp is dimed, it sounds like poop. With these problems, it'll get put back on the shelf real fast in most music stores.

Five minutes of knob turning, switch flipping, and wheel rolling and its a mean machine. Makes me wonder why people call a Stingray "aggressive." (Yes, I own a 'Ray so I can do a real comparison between the two.)
 
just my opinion on bass guitars in general. I prefer the bass to support the drums...to be the "rhythm section", if you will. Any bass guitar with more than 1 pickup, in my eyes, is what I'd call a lead instrument.

I know it sounds ignorant because I notice many bass players like the "blend-ability" of a Jazz bass...but that's not me.

Anyway, as much as I like the look of a Jaguar Bass, I prefer a bass with a simpler set-up.
 
The extra switches make it look like a toy. The design looks like something that would have been developed at about the same time as the Edsal. Just my opinion. You are free to love it as I'm sure you know. ;)

Oh and i reserve the right to change my mind on this too. I use to be appalled by the idea of "relic" now I kinda like them.
 
I'd probably want one if...

(a) it had a neck pickup (either instead of the bridge pickup, or in addition to both pickups [in which case i would want there to be switching options to allow for all 7 pickup combinations]), and...

(b) it came with a dedicated instruction sheet to explain how to operate all the knobs and switches. All I can ever find on the Fender website is generic instructions that do not explain the controls for this particular instrument

As it is, I think it is a fantastic-looking instrument...
 
minus 1,000. Really if one of my favorite players started using one I'd just wonder what kind of endorsement deal he was now getting. Then I sit back watch their "Jaguar" threads pile up on this forum. :rollno::rollno:
 
If they sold lefty Jag basses here in the states, I'd have one.

dsc01304sy9.jpg



:D
 
I'd probably want one if...it came with a dedicated instruction sheet to explain how to operate all the knobs and switches. All I can ever find on the Fender website is generic instructions that do not explain the controls for this particular instrument

Missing from the diagram below are the bridge pup and master tone control:
 

Attachments

  • JagControls.jpg
    JagControls.jpg
    33.2 KB · Views: 180
Well, I like the body shape. Maybe if there was an American Std. people would accept it more as a Fender (I personally don't care, I really like some of the MIM Classic stuff). While the electronics isn't that bad, I wished this bass would have been treated more as a retro style bass, with neck binding, 70's BMFL tuners, mahogany body, Tele bass humbucker in mid and bridge position (or alternately "double J" pups), passive electronics. This could be a Fender version of a Thunderbird bass but with fender typical bolt on neck eventually with maple board option (like a "Fenderbird"). Maybe as a MIM Deluxe version. But maybe that's just me...
 
I owned a Jaguar briefly. The construction and fit and finish were top-notch. It was very easy to play and was very versatile with the tones that it provided. However, the lack of shielding in the body cavity and pickguard as well as the curious placement of the preamp board (right above the neck pickup in an unshielded route) caused a buzz that was unbearable. The amount of work needed to shield the entire bass was not worth to me on an $750-800 bass. Shouldn't be necessary on an instrument in that range. IMO a great idea executed poorly. If you don't mind the work needed to do the shielding, go for it. Probably a better deal used.


I'm primarily a 5 string player but wanted to buy a good quality 4 string as backup and to join my tool box whenever a 4 string is needed. The Jaguar feels good and is very flexible tone wise. I love the parallel/series switch. It's like a jazz bass with balls!

My Jag had the shielding noise. Yesterday I got the copper shielding tape in the mail from stewmac. It took me about 20 minutes to fix and the hum is gone. It's an easy fix and the hum issue should not deter anyone from buying and enjoying this bass. The cavities are shielded with conductive paint. The only problem is that you have to ground them to each other. It just takes a small amount of copper shielding tape to accomplish this.

rllefebv took the attached picture. It's pretty self explanatory and works great. The Jag is a great bass and anyone who is interested should definitely buy one.
 

Attachments

  • jag_shld.jpg
    jag_shld.jpg
    55.6 KB · Views: 1,785
It's actually kind of hard to see what he did there. Obviously the tape is peeking out from behind the upper horn's chrome panel, but what is he taping it to? it just looks like he yanked the wires out from the middle cavity and taped them to the body. I can't imagine the pickguard can sit right like that.