Prog was never supposed to be for the masses, perish the thought!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I put Hawkwind in with other space rock bands of the early 70's: Pink Fairies, early UFO, Stray, and the like.
So, I guess we're ruling out any of John Cage's work???Sort of like Classical and Jazz, isn't it?
Most people don't really listen to the music and if it gets complicated, they opt out.
It doesn't fit into "It's easy to dance to, Dick, I'd give it a 7." mold.
Prog was never supposed to be for the masses, perish the thought!
Grunge didn't kill it, I'm pretty sure Hair Metal immolated from all that hair spray.Was it really even shorter lived than any other genre? People can talk about the old "GRUNGE KILLED HAIR METAL!" trope, but "grunge" (as either a genre or a marketing term) was really only the big deal for 3 or so years before music moved on, like it always does.
Sorry, but I've been on most of the moors in Britain... none of them are dusty.
Just sayin'
(<<< sheepishly admits to enjoying some Go-Gos from time to time.)I wouldn't want to like music the masses might like. Or at least I wouldn't like to admit to also liking bands like Banarama in public anyway. Oh, fudge cookies...
That's a great point. "Grunge" was extremely popular, the mainstream at one point, and while some of those bands managed to extend their lifespans way beyond the first few years of the subgenre's heyday due to being critically as well as commercially successful, or changing their sound a bit, they also managed to blend in with the next pop/rock music phase (until breaking up or losing members to death!).Was it really even shorter lived than any other genre? People can talk about the old "GRUNGE KILLED HAIR METAL!" trope, but "grunge" (as either a genre or a marketing term) was really only the big deal for 3 or so years before music moved on, like it always does.
Same here. The first time I heard Rush I was completely mesmerised by their sound. A buddy of mine was into Rush and let me listen to a few of their songs from the Moving Pictures album. The thing that immediately came to mind was that their music had a futuristic vibe to it.
...By 1980, prog became pop-ish, tighter, and more processed - or it faded out, looking rather silly, and self-absorbed (not like us!). "Owner of a Lonely Heart," "Tom Sawyer," "Abacab," "Heat of the Moment," "Neal and Jack and Me" (not a hit), became the sound of prog. Some of it danceable, some of it sorta about girls, some of it under 4 minutes, and catchy. So prog was still there, but it wasn't your father's prog, it wasn't extended organ solos, a section of Hymalayan bells and rare prayer cymbals with accompanying Tibetan chants, or the usual multi-layered guitar solo anthems, jarring time changes or the fun of adding an extra eighth note the 3rd time through for the hell of it - but it was prog, sorta....
And who could forget the Bangles(<<< sheepishly admits to enjoying some Go-Gos from time to time.)
That wasn't one of my reasons.That's the joke. They don't constitute "the people" in any way, shape, or form.
I felt the same about Pink Floyd for a long time. Compared to Gentle Giant or Yes' mid 70s stuff, a lot of their music seems pretty simplistic, compositionally and technically, on the surface.
But then I made up my mind that Prog Rock was more than being a virtuoso and playing 20 minute songs with odd time signatures. It was also about, you know, being "progressive", coming up with new sounds and ideas, and thinking outside the box as far as what the majority of your contemporaries are doing. Experimenting.
That's what the Beatles did with Sgt. Pepper and The White album. That's what Radiohead has done since their 3rd album. And that's what Floyd did on Dark Side to the Moon (and on their earlier albums). You can listen to that album today, and it sounds like it could have just been released. And there is a sophistication to DSotM that takes a bunch of listens to truly appreciate.
(To be fair, 1971's Meddle, the album before DSotM, had a 23 minute long song that was without question, prog. Animals is also pretty proggy, though I never cared for the sound of that album so never listened to it much; the newly reissued remix could change that).
Most folks can’t dance to 7/4?