TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Brad Johnson said:Just curious... does any of what you just said clash with anything I've been saying?
![]()
I never use a compressor when rehearsing, and frequently don't use one when gigging. But sometimes I *want* to.M.Gilberto said:I don't think one needs a compressor to be able to switch from one technique to another. I have always mixed styles in songs, and never felt the need to use a compressor.
CrackBass said:well i've heard a lot of opinions and why not just play however works for you. man i'm into music for the fun and joy it brings me. i don't need any body telling me im wrong. it's all about the mix, live. you can be the best bassist in the world but if you dont sit in the mix well you might as well be a solo act. whatever tools you employ to make the final product sound its best is what you should use. these days i have a very even attack on my fingerstyle, and i can dig in and pluck louder than i slap. however i find it tiring and it starts to sound different than the sound of a softly plucked string which is the sound i'm diggin' right now. i can also slap quieter than i pluck, but it doesn't sound like i want it to. it does kinda sound like fingerstyle with an added thumb. to get the sound i want i need a certain amount of force and impact. and that is physics. you have to hit the string with a certain amount of force to make it actually contact the fret board and give you that sound. conversly you have to pop your higher strings with enough force to make them do the same thing. once you let the string go it would be like trying to make a rubber band snap back slowly. pardon the pun but it's out of your hands. it's physics. now you can get quieter but only to a point. i use my technique to get the sounds i want and use a comp to bridge the volume gap between them. and sound men love me for it. and btw so do my speakers.
M.Gilberto said:No, I don't think so. That was kinda my point. I particularly agree with the fact that Marcus doesn't slap hard. His slap is tight. BTW, my slap technique is barely (if at all) louder than my fingerstyle. I don't think one needs a compressor to be able to switch from one technique to another. I have always mixed styles in songs, and never felt the need to use a compressor.
Dynamic control is everything, and folks, it just ain't all that hard.
M.Gilberto said:...Not that it's ever worked before. I think everyone's kinda saying the same thing more than they realize. Let's try this:
1) Although the thread was about live rigs, recording is even more likely to put your playing under a microscope. I'm sure that's the only reason it was brought up.
2) They work great for making that "Marcus" sound - as an effect.
3) You shouldn't be using them to cover up for bad technique. Proper dynamics is not THAT difficult, and using a compressor as a crutch is likely to restrict your growth in the area of being able to better control your dynamics in the long run.
>>Group hug<<
?l0calh05t said:actually you are just as right in saying that slap has to be played with a certain degree of force (and this does usually result a louder sound) as Brad Johnson is in saying that you can play slap without being any louder than normal/soft plucking.
Sounds controverial? if you lower your action you can slap with a lot less force to achieve the same sound (of course not everyone likes a low action, so if you like a high action and slap nonetheless you will need a comp to keep it at approximately the same level as your normal playing)
Just trying to say that both arguments (learn controlling your dynamics can remove the need for a comp vs. using a comp to keep the levels even where it is technically impossible without one) are correct in the appropriate scope.
Brad Johnson said:As long as you're aware there are exceptions to what you just said![]()
l0calh05t said:I did say "in the appropriate scope" right?![]()
Brad Johnson said:I'm talking about this:
"Sounds controverial? if you lower your action you can slap with a lot less force to achieve the same sound (of course not everyone likes a low action, so if you like a high action and slap nonetheless you will need a comp to keep it at approximately the same level as your normal playing)".
You "will need"?
![]()
Hrothgar said:I somewhat disagree. IMO, there is too much dynamic inconsistency between fingerstyle and slap to say that just practice alone will resolve the problem.
l0calh05t said:uhh... if the action on your bass is high you will need to apply more force to the string (which tends to make a louder sound in the end) to have it touch the frets (esp. when popping), theres no denying that (it really is physics).
of course if you actually want it to be louder you (of course) don't need a comp.

Brad Johnson said:
Yes, if the action on your bass is high you will need to apply more force to the string than if it were low. The next part is the problem and there absolutely IS some denying it. Louder than what?
It will not necessarily be any louder based on how high your action is. How loud you are depends on many things, INCLUDING HOW YOU PLAY. High action allows you to play harder... that doesn't mean you'll be any louder. If it did automatically make you louder it would be more difficult to play softly with higher action, wouldn't it? In fact I've found it much easier to play softly with higher action... you don't have to refine your touch to the same degree as with very low action. That's physics
At this point I'll leave you guys to your own devices. It would be great to actually meet IRL and I could show you just what I don't seem to be able to get across in words.
![]()