^ That's my experience with a lot of P/J basses, some of them manage to get around the issue somewhat.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
^ That's my experience with a lot of P/J basses, some of them manage to get around the issue somewhat.

johnk_10 said:i realize that there's alot of love for it (especially in this thread), but the P J setup just doesn't do it at all for me. i love the p pickup by itself, but when you run the j pickup with it (especially with both pickups on full, but even with any amount of blending), the E & A sound so much different than the D & G due to the P's split locations, that the different phasing that takes place makes it sound like two different basses split right down the middle of the neck. IMO, two 'straight-across' pickups (like a jazz bass a ric, or an HH ray) sounds much better. two split P's, or reversed P's, would also work fine, but the standard split p/j bass thing just sounds so thin on the D & G that i find the configuration unusable.
Never found that to be the case. They all sound even on my basses. The pj is just meaner and more mid forward sounding than a dc or mm style pup.
johnk_10 said:that's strange, it does it on every single one them that i've played (on some it's more drastic than others, but it's stil there on all of them). IME, it's just the 'nature of the beast'. whenever you have two pickups on at the same time, phase cancellations occur, and the phasing is more prevalent the closer the pickups are together. i'll post a sound clip tomorrow using one that i am servicing for a friend to demonstrate what i mean.
Cool.
i've played and worked on more than a couple of 100 of them and i agree that some work better than others, but 'somewhat' better just never worked for me.![]()
I was tempted to buy this P/J bass off craigslist and I see the P is real close to the J and was wondering what it sounded like. This is a Louis Johnson's Treker bass from the 80's. There is an "active boost" switch which makes the bass louder probably for solos
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
it looks like the P pup is in the sweet spot, so I'd say that it probably sounds better than most.
Well there's an interesting idea for a bass. On the surface it seems like it would solve the output balance issue, and I'm sure the P pickup would sound great for rock at the bridge. I wonder how it all compares to a traditional P/J... can bridge J sounds be had?
I'm not TOTALLY buying into the 'sweet-spot' idea since it moves when you put your fingers on a string anyplace on the neck.
Ya mean that the string doesn't get shorter if I play on the 12th fret?
How's that working for ya?

+1
90% or better of guys run the p and j up full (balance in the middle or just slightly panned). The individual pickup thing isn't really where those basses want to be . The magic is in the bass / treb controls of the pre and slight variations from center on the balance. You can do it, but it wasn't really what it was designed for. It's not really a P with a J, its a p/j combo if that makes sense. Once you figure it out, its cool. Used mine for everything from children's albums to death metal.
not at all. the string is shorter but the pickup location hasn't moved with it.
IMO, you're thinking about it wrong. if the sweet spot didn't make a difference in its harmonic balance, you could put the pickup anywhere and it would sound the same.
BTW, the P and reverse P arrangement that you have on the yellow bass exacerbates the diffence in phasing issues when both pickups are on even more than the P J or reverse P J arrangement.
