I know others who consider them entry level basses spurned by the likes of Entwhistle as not providing what he wanted).
Most of Entwistle"s classic stuff was recorded on Fenders. IMO the best tone he ever got was from Pbasses, e.g. Live At Leeds.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I know others who consider them entry level basses spurned by the likes of Entwhistle as not providing what he wanted).
Whoa, whoa, whoa. The first G&L's, beyond vague basic shapes, were certainly NOT copies.
Most of Entwistle"s classic stuff was recorded on Fenders. IMO the best tone he ever got was from Pbasses, e.g. Live At Leeds.
+1!"These (G&L) are the best guitars I ever made" - Leo Fender
I agree
"These (G&L) are the best guitars I ever made" - Leo Fender
I agree
Pretty much this. I don't how some people are so blind they can't see it's simply a matter of preference rather than blind fanboy-ism. Sure it may be true that one is first introduced to Fender (or any other brand, truth be told) thru their favorite bassist should they play one, if the bass doesn't satisfy them, most would try something else. The only reason I play Fenders now is because I played one once, and I loved it, not because so and so played one.wait. so you dont own a fender AND you dont play a fender AND you dont care for them?! mind. blown. i think most people that play fenders play them because they like them. just like most people that play ibanez play them because they like them. just like most people that play warwick play warwicks because they like them....and so on.
And even the later models that are P and J derivatives - can one really "copy" his own designs?
Kinda silly to call G&L a copycat when it was Leo Fender's own company, right?