• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why doesn't Spector improve their body design?

Jun 16, 2019
313
143
Spector has a very comfortable body design, the all rounded edges, belly scoop, etc. However, why don't they make the upper horn longer to prevent neck-dive? As well as the distance from the edge to the bridge, the bass will be more balanced if there's not a lot of space between the bridge and the strap peg(even tho the peg was already moved up a bit but it doesn't help a lot.)

I know Spector's body shape is based on Ned Steinberger's design but even Ned himself extended the upper horn for a whole lot on his NS-Design basses, why doesn't Spector do so?
EURO4LXBBM_main-scaled-e1579018758929.jpg

NS Radius CR5-CS.jpg
 
I sold mine as well. It still haunts me because I absolutely loved the tone. These very simple modifications mentioned would make me a very loyal Spector user. There are tons of reviews with the same complaints on this.
Ikr, they don't seem to be altering their design any time soon cuz their basses are selling well. However, Warwick managed to improve Ned Steinberger's design and has made the Streamer more ergonomic than Spector.
 

Latest posts