• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why don’t you play a six-string bass?

I have 10 five string basses and one six which is fretless.
Fretted sixes frustrate me, keep tripping up on the slap and pop.
In the perfect world my current 6 would be a 5.
It's not a perfect world. Bass was available used at the one trade price I would ever be able to afford :)
 
I bought my first six-string bass this summer after playing four-string basses exclusively for over 15 years. Honestly, I can't imagine going back to four (Ok, I could probably do with a five). Having the extended range of the B and, although to a lower degree, the C strings without losing what makes a four a four seems like a no brainer.

Why haven't you made the change to a six or even five string bass already?

If you don't use all the strings on either a 5 or 6, you don't need either, stay with a 4 string. I play 5s and 6s but, as I get older the 6s are starting to get heavier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jd56hawk
1. Jaco only needed four.

2. Leo got it right the first time.

3. String choice is quite limited and changing strings is EXPENSIVE.

4. When you do your own setup, those six string necks are a test of patience. Either you have dual trussrods (which is scary), or you have a reinforced neck with single rod, but in any case, do a quarter turn, tune the bass and go on holidays for two weeks, the neck takes ages to set.

5. Muting. Going from four to five feels like you need to wrap your brain around the fact that there's one more string now and once you got that into muscle memory, you're good to go. On a six, you can take the muting technique you learned on a 4 and toss it in the bin, re-learning right hand technique from square one.

6. Note choice. More often than not, you have the choice of playing that note by going one string lower (fatter) and five frets up or going one string down (skinnier) and five frets down. You need to make up your mind, because that fretboard buries you in options.

7. Weight. You think 9lbs is heavy for a bass? Go get a gym membership ASAP!

8. Cost. Buying a six will naturally set you back further than buying the same bass with less strings.

9. Learning the notes on that fretboard takes much longer because there are more strings.

10. Intimidation. When you are in an audition, the guitarist will take a step back when you pull out a bass that has as many strings as their axe's got and they fear for their guitar's precious sonic personal space being invaded by a much bigger guitar, so they will much rather go with the other guy who brought a Fender P bass.

11. Noodling. I mean just because you can does not mean you will, but having the option to go up two octaves and play a quick fill whenever you feel like it (or whenever there's room) certainly invites doing so.


These are my personal top reasons not to play a six string bass.












P.S.
I currently own three basses: Two six strings and a Fender P.
 
I have played them. They are not really useful in my current project. Also the added weight and longer scale is a burden I don't need. It's nice to have one to noodle around on though.
P7201151.JPG
 
I don't play a six because I'm ornery.


However, I have been known to drop-tune low E to a D. And once or twice I wondered what having a low B would be like, but then I had to take a solo or something interesting would happen in the music I was playing and I would forget about it.
 
Last edited:
I took home a couple over the years and the problems were:
With a thinner neck, I couldn't get my fingers between strings for slapping, have larger fingers.
With a wider neck, it was hard to do good muting technique.

I think I could probably adapt to the wider neck and muting but it just didn't seem to offer enough advantages. Going lower than D tends to frustrate many sound systems anyway, you're only really hearing the upper harmonics. And Im not convinced your average listener gets the difference. For higher notes, I always play at least 24 fret instruments, so I have enough and Ill just tap if I need a reach that isn't possible on four.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Polfuste
. . . . Why haven't you made the change to a six or even five string bass already?

Each to their own.

I switched to 5 string basses in 1996. I'm a low end of the fretboard player, and I found that a B string enhanced my playing significantly. It was a game changer.

I never felt the need for more flexibility, so a 6'er has never been on my radar.
 
I bought my first six-string bass this summer after playing four-string basses exclusively for over 15 years. Honestly, I can't imagine going back to four (Ok, I could probably do with a five). Having the extended range of the B and, although to a lower degree, the C strings without losing what makes a four a four seems like a no brainer.

Why haven't you made the change to a six or even five string bass already?
mainly because there's no gig I do that requires such an extended range. In fact, a four string Fender or Lakland is all that's needed on 99% of gigs I do. And that's what they expect.
 
6s, 5s and 4s here. 19mm.

I record with 6s most often out of ease and comfort, I gig with 5's, and I use 4s for a couple of gigs where the BL doesn't like 5s on stage.

For clarity and a bit of myth-busting, none of my 6-string basses are inherently heavier than 4's or 5's.