Dang. TalkBass really needs a sarcasm font. Some of you folks are WAY too serious.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'm sure many of you have seen the Rick Beato interview with Sting and his guitarist, Dominic Miller. It was a fascinating look into songwriting, basslines, and (inadvertently) one gargantuan ego.
It was a great conversation. But when Rick began to discuss the other members of The Police (Stewart Copeland and Andy Summers), Sting stepped in and essentially gave himself credit for their contributions to the band.
At some points it was subtle. Others, not so much. But I found it to be very off-putting that one of my all-time favorite musicians showed so little humility in dealing with his bandmates.
Did anyone else notice that?
I guarantee you that most of your favorite musicians would not be a great hang. I think Sting is ridiculously talented. I've been tasked with singing amd playing some Police songs at the se time. I cam tell you he's no ordinary musician.
The fact that he's not warm and fuzzy doesn't change that at all. Most of the greats aren't.
He is well-spoken, with crisp enunciation and an even pace and volume of speech, but his pronunciation of words gives away his Geordie heritage. He doesn't sound that different to some of the middle class folks of the North East that I know. He definitely does sound a long way away from a working class Geordie.
In an interview at the time, Sting said he was invited to the studio to record "you're under arrest" in French to be on the album. He recorded it in one take and then Miles grabbed his (own) crotch and said "arrest THIS mother f——r". Next thing Sting new he had been escorted out of the building and was standing in the alley.
25990282[/URL], member: 83288"]What genius isn't temperamental? They are always in another plane of existence than the rest of us worm food. Maybe they get tired of trying to explain why they do what they do and just come to the conclusion "Hey, if you don't get it,
You are confusing IQ with genius. Those who are considered "genius" seem to be in another plane of consciousness in which they perceive ideas, not obvious to others, in a very clear understanding and use that knowledge to the betterment of humankind. I've met high IQ individuals who were completely unable to develop any kind of original idea. They were just good at following the established "rules" to their advantage. Also, trivia experts are considered high IQ. I just think they are good at remembering a bunch of worthless crap. Can they use their knowledge to create something new? Geniuses are just on a higher plane of consciousness then most of us.
He was lovely both times we played with him. First time he was mostly interested in the football on the dressing room TV, but so were we so that's fair; the match went into extra time and he made a joke about us playing a second set so he could watch the end. Second show he was much more personable and came to find us after the set to have a chat and get a photo. My singer asked him how long he'd been out on tour (as you tend to do when you are far enough into a run to start missing real beds and food) and he paused to think before answering "Sometime in 1978". I suspect his style of touring was slightly less gruelling than ours.
We didn't get to watch much of him either show due to travel times but did catch both soundchecks; they ran a couple of new tunes and he was being very particular about the arrangements so they really drilled down into one transition and repeated it till he was happy. The band took it in stride and he was a pretty shrewd communicator about what he wanted so I got the impression that was the general tour vibe rather than just him being picky that night. In any case they sounded incredible and the road crew were lovely to us. I was mainly concerned about Josh Freese being there (because Devo and Replacements) which sort of overshadowed the whole STING IS HERE thing for me to be totally honest.
I believe we were meant to be doing more shows with him but our schedule could only fit the two in which turned out to be lucky as he had to cancel most of the run due to voice issues.
Based on this thread, I went into watching the interview with certain expectations. I didn't find Sting to be all that irritating although that version of every little thing was a bit cringe. I chuckled at the bewildered look on Stings face as Beato explained the theory behind his writing. I believe Sting when he says he just goes with his intuition. I've used the word intuitive to describe The Police before. No one before or after sounds quite like them and I don't think you get songs like that theoretically mapping chord changes and structures. (IMHO)
Stewart Copeland talks about this as well. He finds it amusing that his work is exhaustively analyzed, while almost all of the drum tracks were 1st or 2nd takes, written by impulse rather than design.you are probably right ...
but I have seen this multiple times where someone analyzes a song and get's really deep into the theory and the guy who wrote the song simply thought "gee this sounds nice"
Of course he did. Michael Henderson says:There's stealing & then there's "stealing". IMO, MD was OK with the "stealing"...like he never did?
Stewart Copeland talks about this as well. He finds it amusing that his work is exhaustively analyzed, while almost all of the drum tracks were 1st or 2nd takes, written by impulse rather than design.