TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Pine, poplar, ironwood - a few I can cite quickly - are names that can stand for many different species that can differ widely in their properties. For example, I have a G&L P bass made of pine (sugar pine) which is heavy, hold screws well and has a great P bass tone, it has very little in common with what sells in Home Depot as pine.The late EVH preferred it for its resonance in guitars for his own use.
I grew up in East Texas where pine trees are grown in farms for use in paper and lumber. Most homes are framed in pine lumber, so that tells me it's obviously strong enough, and Pine has surfaced in several Squier re-issues of Fender Classics. It's just fine for me, though you can run into balance issues where a hard maple neck with 4 or 5 big tuning keys may weigh more than the body.
Gee, maybe Fender will do a cross-promotion and sell 'Yellawood' Strats !
To the best of my knowledge, short of having it cut yourself as I did, you will not find any "actual poplar" (popple, etc.) in the lumber trade. As far as the lumber trade is concerned, tuliptree is "really poplar."really? so when i buy poplar from say menards its not really poplar? everyone keeps talking about how hard it is but I made some built-in cabinets to paint white and it was so soft
I don't get why Ash became popular over poplar for guitar bodies, it's heavy and has a really coarse open grain, and you have to grain fill the heck out of it, which Is why Fender hosed them down with Fullerplast. Meh. I did a Warmoth Frankenjazz with Ash, and that sucker is HEAVY.
The American 'poplar' (actual species unknown!) that I got recently (a custom body from a luthier near Chicago) was much harder than basswood, and just as heavy as typical American alder (maybe even on the heavy side).Poplar in general does not finish too well. Structurally it is fine. Does anyone know how it compares to basswood?
I'm glad it worked out well for you. Who ever thought? Poplar? It is usually used where appearance does not matter, like bracing in furniture.The American 'poplar' (actual species unknown!) that I got recently (a custom body from a luthier near Chicago) was much harder than basswood, and just as heavy as typical American alder (maybe even on the heavy side).
Similar color to basswood, didn't have much in the way of mineral streaks - and anyway it got an opaque sparkle-flake finish. But really astonishing sound, all the brightness of solid rock maple, but a richer tonality ( and not nearly the weight of the same body in maple...)
Its far better to me than basswood. Which is another soft, yet light and good sounding wood.This question is directed at people who believe (like myself) that body wood affects tone. Not trying to feed into that ongoing debate over whether body wood matters or not here. The only bass I've ever owned that is made of poplar just happens to be the most resonant and has great tone. Acoustically, it is loud and it's a solid body. I realize that it's a cheaper wood but the only downside I can see is that because of the softness, the screws tend to strip their holes a little easier. This can easily be remedied, though. My question is, being that it's so cheap and sounds so good, why do you suppose more instruments aren't made out of it? It there a stigma of some sort against poplar among luthiers? Just curious.
Thanks for your input.
This question is directed at people who believe (like myself) that body wood affects tone. Not trying to feed into that ongoing debate over whether body wood matters or not here. The only bass I've ever owned that is made of poplar just happens to be the most resonant and has great tone. Acoustically, it is loud and it's a solid body. I realize that it's a cheaper wood but the only downside I can see is that because of the softness, the screws tend to strip their holes a little easier. This can easily be remedied, though. My question is, being that it's so cheap and sounds so good, why do you suppose more instruments aren't made out of it? It there a stigma of some sort against poplar among luthiers? Just curious.
Thanks for your input.
. It did machine well and such though, but I would be hesitant to use it again just from the perspective of the dentability (is that a word?)