• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Why PJ, Why Not Precision and Big Split or Soapbar

I have a Nordstrand NP5 (reverse) and a Big Split (70's position) in my VJ5. Sounds great. Cuts but fatter than a J, and no hum.

089.jpg
Wow I love that spin on a classic design!
 
On my Jaguar SS, I don't find the J useful by itself at all. I wind up using it as a tone control for the p and usually wind up around 70/30 P/J respectively. I'm thinking about doing a quarter pounder just for the J since the bass doesn't lend itself to a boutique pick-up. If I did an original build I would seriously consider a QP P and a medium hot dually J.

Kurt
 
It'd be fun to do sort of a P/'Ray configuration, though I guess you'd need to attenuate the humbucker a bit. That could be achieved via internal trimpot or something.

Or a triple-coil pickup like in the Ibanez ATK's (don't recall who they got the idea from) for some cool switchable tone control.

ESP surveyor had a Musicman style and p style pickups. Active EMGs though. They are discontinued now and we're replaced by the AP basses with HH duncans but the surveyors were like a p bass with no pickgaurd and a different but still classy headstock.
 
I like the nasal twang a single bridge J gives to the P sound, it's a great sonic combination, but I'm also a fan of the reverse P too. A bridge humbucker tends to give a bit more meat, but you're getting plenty of meat off the P so twang, I say, twang is where the goodness is.

cha_6.jpg


king_6.jpg