- Sep 5, 2014
- 5,455
- 4,234
- Disclosures
- None
I've been reading with somewhat keen interest posts about various amps. I personally own a Crate BX-100 100 watt 1x15. While it isn't perfect (It is super heavy for what it is) I see a LOT of hate for Crate and Behringer amps in particular.
In my experience, while limited, I have been observing others as well. My Crate has been through HEAVY (minimum 2 hours / day) use from 2002 - 2007. I stopped / seriously slowed down my playing until recently when certain life events kicked me in the butt to get moving again...
A colleague of mine, and the guy that inspired me to get the Crate in the first place has the BX-100, he bought his new in 2001, and has been rocking it semi pro non stop since. He also has the 450 watt Behringer head with an unknown model Crate cabinet. All of this was picked up if I recall in 2005 or 2006 with again, semi pro use.
LOTS of local bands here can be seen with Crate and Behringer guitar / bass amps, mostly fed out to mixers, and unknown power amps (most of the time) but at least one venue I know of is using Behringer for their entire PA system. No problems...
I was active on another, seemingly now defunct bass forum early on where at least Crate wasn't a dirty word. Actually LOTS of players were running them...
So it would seem from what I see here, that TB members seem to have a bad collective taste in their mouths for both of these brands, and I am sure others...
Is it because there really is that much higher of a failure rate than other brands of equipment? Or is there something else about it?
I am sure I am not the only one to see Ampegs let out the magic smoke on stage. GKs aren't immune either. Countless Fender Rumbles have blown speakers, and power circuits... So why the specifically directed hate toward Crate and Behringer?
I have seen this with other fields of interest too. There seems to be a herd mentality where the costlier item of a given type, let's say Hammers, are somehow magically better because of a brand name put on them. What I am wondering, is there actually any real empirical evidence either proving, or disproving the quality of a given piece of equipment, or is it all about subjective opinion?
The reason I ask is although my Crate has been effective for me for a lot of years, I am giving serious consideration to the Behringer BXL3000A. Yes the added power is an incentive, I won't lie about that, but the added features, particularly output / line level options is a huge draw for me. I can, and do run XLR out of my Crate to my mixer no problem, aside from a cosmetic one. I would rather the jack be in the back so I can route the cable hidden... I know it's a minor thing, but since my studio is also my home office, and my wife tends to spend time in there, I want it to be as uncluttered looking as possible.
In my experience, while limited, I have been observing others as well. My Crate has been through HEAVY (minimum 2 hours / day) use from 2002 - 2007. I stopped / seriously slowed down my playing until recently when certain life events kicked me in the butt to get moving again...
A colleague of mine, and the guy that inspired me to get the Crate in the first place has the BX-100, he bought his new in 2001, and has been rocking it semi pro non stop since. He also has the 450 watt Behringer head with an unknown model Crate cabinet. All of this was picked up if I recall in 2005 or 2006 with again, semi pro use.
LOTS of local bands here can be seen with Crate and Behringer guitar / bass amps, mostly fed out to mixers, and unknown power amps (most of the time) but at least one venue I know of is using Behringer for their entire PA system. No problems...
I was active on another, seemingly now defunct bass forum early on where at least Crate wasn't a dirty word. Actually LOTS of players were running them...
So it would seem from what I see here, that TB members seem to have a bad collective taste in their mouths for both of these brands, and I am sure others...
Is it because there really is that much higher of a failure rate than other brands of equipment? Or is there something else about it?
I am sure I am not the only one to see Ampegs let out the magic smoke on stage. GKs aren't immune either. Countless Fender Rumbles have blown speakers, and power circuits... So why the specifically directed hate toward Crate and Behringer?
I have seen this with other fields of interest too. There seems to be a herd mentality where the costlier item of a given type, let's say Hammers, are somehow magically better because of a brand name put on them. What I am wondering, is there actually any real empirical evidence either proving, or disproving the quality of a given piece of equipment, or is it all about subjective opinion?
The reason I ask is although my Crate has been effective for me for a lot of years, I am giving serious consideration to the Behringer BXL3000A. Yes the added power is an incentive, I won't lie about that, but the added features, particularly output / line level options is a huge draw for me. I can, and do run XLR out of my Crate to my mixer no problem, aside from a cosmetic one. I would rather the jack be in the back so I can route the cable hidden... I know it's a minor thing, but since my studio is also my home office, and my wife tends to spend time in there, I want it to be as uncluttered looking as possible.