TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
In this case, I agree. I vote no thumb rest.don't do it. stay minimal![]()
Well, it would look "normal" if you put one on there. But I wouldn't put extra holes in it unless you absolutely need and use one.Does it look naked without the thumbrest???? I don't know . . .
Well, it would look "normal" if you put one on there. But I wouldn't put extra holes in it unless you absolutely need and use one.
Looks awesome btw.
AIUI, the lower position is called (for the same piece of wood) a "tug bar" rather than a "thumb rest" which suggests hooking it with fingers while plucking with thumb, to me. But I don't have, don't use, and would also likely skip it unless you do use it, and put it where you'd actually use it in that case.I'm not sure how these rests are used. The ones on later P-basses that are above the strings make more sense.
AIUI, the lower position is called (for the same piece of wood) a "tug bar" rather than a "thumb rest" which suggests hooking it with fingers while plucking with thumb, to me. But I don't have, don't use, and would also likely skip it unless you do use it, and put it where you'd actually use it in that case.