• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Wireless ban

Personally, i've been wondering why no one has made a wireless unit that sets up a secure wifi connection between the guitar and receiver.

I'm probably just not understanding the specific aspects of it.

If there is a lot of "internet activity" while using said device, the signal would have terrible tracking.... I think.
 
The band in question was formerly used for analog TV. The wireless mics (and IEM, personal listening devices, etc. ANYTHING that broadcasts in those frequencies) used the spaces between the TV stations. When they quit analog TV it wasn't to make TV better, it was so the FCC could sell the licensing of those bands, as asserted earlier for other communications devices. Those include emergency bands, but also 4G networks, etc.

And the reason for the rebate is to get the stuff back, refurbish it, and sell it in countries where those frequencies are still available. Yes, it does apply to evangelists. My church is going to have to replace or discontinue use of one of our wireless mics because it's in that range. From what I've read, the FCC wasn't really aware of how much wireless there was. It's not just week-end warrior bar bands. Even low level high-school theatre productions will use a bunch of wireless systems now. I just did sound for a simple play at a middle school (7 & 8 grade) and we had six wireless mics going. Add in the semi-pro (you local community theater) and pro theatre, churches (my small church uses at least three, and sometimes four wireless units at each service), etc. and there's a TON of gear out there in these bands.

It may or may not impact you directly, but at some point those bands are going to get increasingly crowded and you'll find more and more interference. Plus if you're caught causing the interference, you're the one that's liable under the FCC rules.

John
 
I have 11 units in a series of corporate meeting spaces that will be obsolete in June, all Sony 800 series handhelds and lavalieres.
The fun part; I'm under contract to one of the companies that's vying for the vacated bandwidth for their wireless network(s).
The look on their face when I told them why we could no longer use those microphones was priceless. Now, they're fighting amongst themselves to determine whose department will be paying for the new mics.
 
Consider yourselves lucky, here in Finland we don't have the liberty to "stay out of ban zone" because they're bringing down all the current wireless frequencies. The best thing is that the new frequencies haven't been decided yet but the old ones are wanted down fast.

Lucky me, I thought of getting wireless gear for my bass but haven't done so yet. Maybe I'll pick up some Soviet military gear, they have enough output power to punch through anything :D
 
Kof, kof, kof! The government makes money? Who told you that? Which government? Can you say budget deficit?

Certainly, the UK government held an action just for the mobile phone companies to bid for the frequencies that became free so that they would hold the licence for them. I believe the whole process netted the UK government a 6 billion pound windfall in extra revenue.

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

These frequencies are now licensed to the companies that wanted them the most, ie mobile phone communications. There was never a total strip down of the frequencies but a removal of there use to certain sections of the community and business.Essential services are allowed to continue till they have a digital switch over. Then as with the great digital switch over here all analogue based frequencies and channels will again be up for action.