WR: Ooops, I forgot to state that, didn't I? The width of the neck at the nut is actually 1 6/8". The nut is slightly wider than that. Thanks for asking ...
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
i tried about 30 different basses and in each one i found something that i didn't like i decided to have a handmade instrument.There is a very good craftsman in Belgrade and right now i'm saving money for his work.WR: Ooops, I forgot to state that, didn't I? The width of the neck at the nut is actually 1 6/8". The nut is slightly wider than that. Thanks for asking ...
He calls it the "PK". Did you know that? I asked him if he planned to make any more in the future and he said he might.
That was my idea....top half like the Lobe and lower half like the Stude
Pete K.
Okay gang: Well, I dialed the new Lobe in tonight. Wish emailed me after the auction and mentioned that this bass "sang" more than some of his others and I have to agree! The sustain on it is killer - so is the m-wah factor. I don't know why, but wood is a mysterious material and some times certain combinations result in one trait or another. I am very happy about the way this one sounds and the woods used are very, very interesting looking. Tons of grain and some really neet looking knots and crags. The body is persimmon both front and back with about an inch of spalted holly in the middle, which is really unique. The neck width is almost narrow for one of Wishes 5r's, but I like a closer string spacing so it suits me. Action is reasonable right out of the box, but I will lower it over time. Overall I really, really dig it, but I have to say that the finish work is especially rough on this one compared to my maple Lobe. In fact, the maple Lobe actually feels smooth compared to this new 5r. The wood is very rough in spots (neck and bridge areas) and there seem to be a lot of tool chatter marks and such. I think my biggest complaint is how the tuning machines are mounted - they are noticably crooked and will need to be realigned to the headstock and new little anchoring holes drilled. (That is going to be tricky because some of them only need to move a tiny bit and the new hole will try and slip into the old!) If I was someone else, and not so interested in refinishing work, this one would be hard to live with as is - it just is too rough and scratchy feeling. Luckily though, I love doing that so I know this one will be a great bass when I get around to cleaning it up. (Also, the headstock, for some reason, is huge compared to the others - it doesn't look bad, it is just bigger in all respects than usual, the opening included.) All in all, I am very happy I got it. I don't foresee getting around to working on this one for a while though, as much as I would like to - too much else going on.
- Guess that's it for now ...