We should not forget that 'mass culture' is a market driven thing. People get big/famous because they are attractive with what they 'stand for'.
It is pivot to create an 'image' following and/or contradicting the myths of the genre you are throwing yourself in. We all know about the 'values' of the role models in jazz. It is all about the narratives and how they are accomplished, expectations feed by individuals the best they can. Could all male icons of jazz have been also female? I'd dare to question that. And I also wonder why this would have been a good thing.
(Saying this with, ehem, Marx

Making art is the result of a struggle in a certain time that reflects the status quo / the longings of the maker. Men or woman. And so the statement should make a difference.
Giving that there is a 'truth factor' in artistic production, which is hard to see because of all the statistics telling the market value (where the article of the OP falls into; quantities are not qualities), I would love to see and hear more woman telling a different story, one that is not about fulfilling males fantasies but making their own points.
Where are the Nina Simones and Billie Holidays (both victims of the 'male power system' they needed to anchor into for economic survival) today speaking up, accusing, strongly with their voice.
Oh, and where is the female quote on TB, arguing here about all this?