• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Wood p@rn - why do we bother?

If I see a painted bass, I have little expectation. It could be anywhere from fantastic to a piece of crap.

If I see a bass made of premium woods, I have an expectation that it should be high-end, which includes superior workmanship, not just looks.

When I see a (fairly rare) bass out of high end woods but which has problems do to poor design or poor execution and lack of care to details and quality, it pisses be off that someone would waste good wood and try to pass it off as a good bass.

If I see a poor quality painted bass, unless I know it was high dollar and/or carries expensive hardware, I don't care.
 
I always think figured woods on a bass look pretty vulgar to be honest. Like the sort of dining table a lottery winner might buy - ostentatious and ugly. But then I've never thought of getting a personalised plate for my car. Or buying a massive gold chain. Or a medallion with my initials on it. Etc.

Depends entirely on the wood, as there are thousands available, each with unique appearances. (But if you're talking about Lacewood, or one of the "vomit burls," than yes, absolutely horrid.)

Having a good figured top is not necessarily extravagant, either. Like I said, there are a ton of plywood bodies with high grade veneer tops. It doesn't cost much to do an instrument that way.
 
If I see a painted bass, I have little expectation. It could be anywhere from fantastic to a piece of crap.

If I see a bass made of premium woods, I have an expectation that it should be high-end, which includes superior workmanship, not just looks.

When I see a (fairly rare) bass out of high end woods but which has problems do to poor design or poor execution and lack of care to details and quality, it pisses be off that someone would waste good wood and try to pass it off as a good bass.

If I see a poor quality painted bass, unless I know it was high dollar and/or carries expensive hardware, I don't care.

+1000

Nothing pisses me of more than a waste of nice wood. It upsets me when I see an instrument that is basically a scrap-heap of expensive wood. Likewise, a poor quality painted instrument is about as rare as rain in Seattle.
 
I live in the desert and my car is a nice, boring, silver/tan.
Hides the dust quite well, I can just clean the glass and go weeks between washes.
Eminently practical.

Simillarly, while I do appreciate instruments with visually attractive arrangements of striated tree pieces, and have owned at least one myself, I find the praticality not realistic for me. Cost/return ratios and all that.
I still play pretty well on the lower budget stuff I play these days.

The others are beautiful to look at, no doubt impeccably made, but just not for me as a player, or as a repair guy/ attempted luthier. Just my opinion.

wraub
 
HaMMerHeD said:
I have a white car and live in Oklahoma. It stays white for a maximum of 3 days before the wind blows red dirt all over it.

Yeah white stays pretty clean in south east Texas. I can imagine that red OK dirt being a pain.
 
It's not really red dirt, it all the excess streamers, paper signs, and OU wear from the landfills that has contaminated the soil color.
:D:p

So its contamination from the scum of the earth college football program in the country? That explains alot

Big Longhorns fan here if you can't tell :D

Aye. Definitelt too much ou crap. Contaminates my brain. I like to wear orange when I go to campus. I don't care for Texas any more than I do Oklahoma, but I do like to antagonize the fanatics.