• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Worst Bass Cab You Have Played Through?

Pretty much any cab with a 12" speaker when played by itself. They have no punch and make my bass sound muddy like it has flats. I do like a 112 cab paired with my 210. Nice and punchy from the 10s and a bit more bottom from the 12.

Have you ever tried the tc RS112? That's the best sounding single 12 cab I've used. Co-axial eminence driver with a 40 watt eminence horn screwed to the back of the speaker magnet. Nice lows and zingy highs with a somewhat low power rating of 200 watts. Which if you think about it is actually decent for a single non neo 12.
 
A Gallien-Krueger Backline cabinet that some hole in the wall venue used as its backline and insisted that all the bands use since there wasn't enough space for our own gear.

I love Gallien-Krueger amps, but this was from their budget line and it showed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shoot-r
Mid-1970s Fender 4-12 Pyramid baffle (or whatever they said it was) cab.

That's it. That's the worst one. I had to play through one of those that was provided as backline at the Hot Tin Roof in Martha's Vineyard every Sunday and Monday over a whole summer. Sundays were supposed to be a reggae gig, which was an utter joke with that cabinet.
 
The Fender 412 Pyramid cabinet; I've never heard or played through one. Everyone seems to hate them. But why, specifically?

What was the design goal? A quasi-horn? Efficiency? Focusing?

I hear people saying they are terrible, but how?

Too middy? Not enough mids? Beamy? No bottom? What is it?

I'd just like to understand just what makes them so bad rather than just "It sucks" or whatever.
 
That's it. That's the worst one. I had to play through one of those that was provided as backline at the Hot Tin Roof in Martha's Vineyard every Sunday and Monday over a whole summer. Sundays were supposed to be a reggae gig, which was an utter joke with that cabinet.

The Fender 412 Pyramid cabinet; I've never heard or played through one. Everyone seems to hate them. But why, specifically?

What was the design goal? A quasi-horn? Efficiency? Focusing?

I hear people saying they are terrible, but how?

Too middy? Not enough mids? Beamy? No bottom? What is it?

I'd just like to understand just what makes them so bad rather than just "It sucks" or whatever.

I have it on authoritative background that these are the original design calculations that Fender CBS did as the modeling foundation for that cabinet.

Trapezoid Scheme.jpg


It's the Trapezoid Scheme. :)
 
The Fender 412 Pyramid cabinet; I've never heard or played through one. Everyone seems to hate them. But why, specifically?

What was the design goal? A quasi-horn? Efficiency? Focusing?

I hear people saying they are terrible, but how?

Too middy? Not enough mids? Beamy? No bottom? What is it?

I'd just like to understand just what makes them so bad rather than just "It sucks" or whatever.

Really weak sound with no presence or low end. Doesn't cut through a mix, doesn't support the sound, it's just yecch.
 
The Fender 412 Pyramid cabinet; I've never heard or played through one. Everyone seems to hate them. But why, specifically?

What was the design goal? A quasi-horn? Efficiency? Focusing? ...

This has been discussed here on TB a few times. Here's a summary as I recall it: It was a Marketing Department design that claimed the speakers firing inward toward each other somehow "concentrates" the bass frequencies and thereby makes "more" bass by virtue of "squishing" all those sound-waves together. ...And as a side benefit you get better dispersion of all frequencies by firing them in different directions. It not only didn't work (one of the main reasons was likely the lack of any appreciable internal cabinet volume BEHIND the speakers and baffleboard)... The "pyramid" baffle ALSO tended to separate/come loose at the seams and start buzzing, which IIRC was very difficult to remedy or patch because the back of the box was integral to the sides and nothing was removable to access anything (very well) to try to glue it back together. That's about the sum of it. ...I think.
 
So no one has chimed in about the isovent? Or will that get us all kicked off?

Oh the Isovent! Tee hee hee!

Remember these ridiculously silly Ampeg cabinets that weighed about 700 pounds?

They had painted enclosures that scratched and flaked if you scraped it with your fingernails, had NO mids at all, and were unbelievably inefficient. Like 95-96db.

Not to mention how laughably ridiculous the 8" thick painted mdf looks (I know its actually plywood, but does it really matter?) combined with those giant plastic kids-toy edges and corners that make it look like it was designed by the Pontiac Aztec team. And that giant chrome zombie eye logo! Get outta here!

I'd take a Fender pyramid ANY DAY over this:

Invalid Link Removed
 
Cabs that are just "not" what I wanted to hear:
...
And, for my ears, the absolutely all time worst.....PV's early 115 thin cabinet. Don't remember the model name. Cabinet dimensions were 24"×24"×11"D, nasty with a capital N.
All these years I thought it was just my novice ears perplexed by that TNT.

More recently I played a gig using some Roland Cube. It was crisp, hard, HiFi when the music called for warm thump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shoot-r
All these years I thought it was just my novice ears perplexed by that TNT.

More recently I played a gig using some Roland Cube. It was crisp, hard, HiFi when the music called for warm thump.

I had an orange Roland Cube bass amp back in the 80s. I loved it. I had to glue the speaker magnet back onto the frame once, but it really sounded OK and was portable. I made the mistake of leaving it in my car overnight. It was gone the next morning, despite the fact that it was well covered.