• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Worst chronic bass design flaws?

As much as I love Fenders, I think the fact that they all require a string tree to keep the string(s) from popping out of the nut to be a bit of a flaw. Not really a big deal though.

I actually forgot to use the string tree for my D string when putting flats on my Squier. It hasn't had any problems saying in the nut, so I wonder if it really makes a difference at all?

To answer the question, how about screw sizes/types? You can't go into any hardware store and just buy replacement screws for control plates or strap buttons (at least, if you expect them to fit.) They need to be ordered from a specialty music retailer like Allparts. And while it may not be technically "universal," it is nonetheless frustrating that there's no standard dimensions for potentiometer shaft/thread diameter/length.

And don't get me started on the metric/imperial thing...:scowl:
 
I would say neck dive is a universally hated flaw. It's not inherent in all basses, but it is a death knell to bass. It's hated because not only is very annoying to try to handle an instrument with this problem, but it shows a lack of care on the behalf of the builder/designer. There is really no excuse for this problem if some just paid attention during the design phase.
 
Tone is not even/balanced enough from string to string. I have yet to play a bass that doesn't suffer from this (unless modded by me :-) Never had the chance play a Dingwall, though.

Fanned frets aren't for everyone but I wish more manufacturers would at least use angled pickups like on the Warwick Thumb. Not a cure, but it does help somewhat.
 
Yes, most fretted instruments suffer from this. The solution to this is pretty wild, though.

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Yeah I've wondered about things like this. It looks really hard to do maintenance on like fret dressing (as has been mentioned). Also, it seems to mee that with frets like that you're pretty much screwed when you try to bend a note.

It does look like those guitars came from a salvador dali painting, though :D
 
There is really no excuse for this problem <Neckdive> if some just paid attention during the design phase.

Looks. Rock and roll.

I'm with you dude, it's just that there are an awful lot of thunderbirds out there. Some people just prioritize looks and image over comfort and ergonomics.

That is also why skinny women have more suitors than fat women. Me, I like comfort :D
 
If horns went to the 10th fret, a lot more basses would be better balanced.

Never played (or even seen) one but I've often wondered if the Fender Bass V balanced well because of this. The neck hit the body at the 12th fret and only had 15 frets total, but with the high C string it still had the same range as a 21 fret bass.

Seems like it would be pretty balanced from a strap. Anybody know? Too bad no one ever refined this design.