The headstock looks huge on the shortie.
Herman Munster signature model.
Herman Munster signature model.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Are you even legally allowed to own a non-MM bass?I would be interested in one in white with black pickguard and that nice checkered binding and shark fin inlays.
I know that would increase the price.
I do like that sound.
Thank goodness I have my short scale active StingRay.
Honestly , what I really want is a nice short scale 5 that can fit in guitar case to fly with.
This Ric sounds great.
Yes, this is a major ergonomic fail that defeats most of the advantages of a short scale (for those of us that like them).Which means you haven't really gained anything from the short scale - the reach to the first fret is the same as the long scale instrument. That's insane.
The break in the binding where the bridge would be on a long scale bass...yeah, that looks silly here. It's like they never really looked at what they did objectively, or even asked around to see if folks would like it.
I haven't gotten to play a Fallout, but I figure it's roughly the same feel as a Fender Mustang,Agreed! I feel like the right hand playing this would be forced into awkward positions unless you wear it really low (which would make it look ridiculous IMO). I have a G&L Fallout bass with similar shortcomings (though the Rickenbacker bridge placement makes it even more extreme)- it is as heavy and large as a long scale with pretty awkward ergonomics, cancelling out several of the benefits of a shorter scale.
I really wish they had re-scaled the entire bass rather than just sliding the bridge forward.
I have both a Fallout and a Mustang, and the Fallout bridge saddles sit a few inches farther away from the body end than the Mustang so the reach to first position is more like a medium-scale. I actually don't mind the feel of the Fallout as a tall guy, but the weight and overall length are about the same as a long scale which is annoying- I wouldn't have bought one if the deal wasn't too good to pass up (and I missed having a bass with one of those big MFD humbuckers).I haven't gotten to play a Fallout, but I figure it's roughly the same feel as a Fender Mustang,
which is the only short-scale bass I've ever found comfortable to play. I think the reason I liked it was that it didn't feel like a SS.
I did try a Rascal once, and put it back on the rack in a hurry.
It seems EBMM does the same withThese have been limited run's, they've been released a couple times over last couple of years...Last batch landed in Europe, few still for sale if you search.
It is, but the neck is the same size to, so the whole thing fits in a standard 4003 case.I wish they had shrunk the body somewhat on the short-scale model. It looks like the body is the same shape/size as the long-scale version.
This would have resulted in a completely new instrument and case, for what will likely be a nitch instrument.I really wish they had re-scaled the entire bass rather than just sliding the bridge forward.

I have no problem carrying a 9 pound bass, but my hands aren't getting any bigger, and carpel tunnel and arthritis are likely here to stay.Most buying a short scale want it shorter and lighter, that's the main selling point. Absolutely wild design decision - hard for me to even wrap my own head around.![]()
That's sort of the point of making a short scale bass. Other company's manage to not half-ass it.This would have resulted in a completely new instrument and case, for what will likely be a nitch instrument.
My 4030 doesn't feel play or look half assed. To each his own.That's sort of the point of making a short scale bass. Other company's manage to not half-ass it.