I like that Warwick has incorporated some of their features on the Sadowskys like the adjustable nut and easy access control cavity plate.That's a good idea because this Warwick situation is not an exact replication of what went on before.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I like that Warwick has incorporated some of their features on the Sadowskys like the adjustable nut and easy access control cavity plate.That's a good idea because this Warwick situation is not an exact replication of what went on before.
I like that Warwick has incorporated some of their features on the Sadowskys like the adjustable nut and easy access control cavity plate.![]()
Not at all the same.Like Ken Smith working out a deal with Brubaker, the company's management was going to change hand in some manner.
Not at all the same.
Sadowsky was looking for a way to go back to the bench focusing on NYC custom shop instruments, dealing with direct customers only. Warwick took over all the rest - all Metro lines, Master Built line, Custom Shop instruments (may cost more than a NYC), parts shop and worldwide marketing. It seems that Roger's involvement is limited and they basically do whatever they want within their agreement, I assume.
Smith lost one of his top guys at the shop who had passed. That's what led to outsourcing the building process to Brubaker. The basses where almost identical, all materials came from Smith. This collaboration ended few months ago and Smith basses are now being built in PA again.
So, following your line of thought, it is also the same as Mike Pedulla who also made a choice of what to do with his company; you don't have to like it either.It is the same in that Sadowsky made a choice of what to do with his company and so did Ken Smith. My point is that it was his choice; you don't have to like it.
So, following your line of thought, it is also the same as Mike Pedulla who also made a choice of what to do with his company; you don't have to like it either.
Of all the things about my RSD, the headstock does not faze me at all. I wanted the Sadowsky neck and the preamp. I admit, there was a time when the headstock would have bothered me, but I guess I'm just past that sort of thing in my old age.
I am 'Old 69 in September and I wouldn't by RSD headstock
Always wanted NYC
Also wouldn't buy G&L because of headstock
Only CLF version
I continue to be 'Shallow'even in my old age![]()
I noticed that as well, I'm not sure when they switched as some of the old advertisements from a year or two ago say Pau Ferro or Morado for fretless, but not really although mine looks ebony to me. And I'm really happy it! There is a slight hump behind the 1st thru 3 RD fret tho, nothing I can't live with but my thumb certainly feels it..I am not certain if this has been brought up so….
I checked the new Metro Express fretless basses on Sweetwater…. None of them came with the Ebony Board on my 2022 model…the new ones all have the Pau Ferro boards.
That's a shame as the Ebony board on my PJ5 Fretless is wonderful