Interesting! Thanks..! More research required...Rumor has it that the Tele bass introduction in 67/68 was due to extra unused slab bodies from the 50's.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Interesting! Thanks..! More research required...Rumor has it that the Tele bass introduction in 67/68 was due to extra unused slab bodies from the 50's.
From what I have been able to find out, they never were finished in anything but blonde..butterscotch is yellowed clear. It’s looking like anything is possible at this point...could it have yellowed enough to require a refinish in a year and a half?Could he have sent it back to the factory to get it refinished from butterscotch to blonde at that time?.
I doubt it. But if that's the case that must have been one heck of a smoke filled bar.From what I have been able to find out, they never were finished in anything but blonde..butterscotch is yellowed clear. It’s looking like anything is possible at this point...could it have yellowed enough to require a refinish in a year and a half?
FWIW I have a Jazz that I bought in 1983 whose neck has a 1978 serial #. I've never had the neck off to look at the heel or pocket for other dates. I always wondered whether the entire instrument sat in a warehouse from 1978 to 1983 or if they had necks sitting around unconnected to a body or or vise versa or what. Clearly Fender did some unexpected things with manufacturing.
Very well putI bought a very beat up 63 P bass and had it refined and didn't get it reliced. There are parts of the bass that are worn looking and yet the finish is new. You can see through the clear parts in the lacquer that gouges and dings in the wood remain where the former player dug his fingernail into the area above the pick guard. I don't think it looks incongruent. If anything it tells the story of the instrument. By relicing an instrument you mask the temporal journey of the instrument, its different owners, eras etc. You accelerate it to a pre-determined state of being that is completely out of touch with its actual lived experience. To me that is uninteresting. My bass is old with a new finish because I bought an old worn bass and put a new finish on it, period. It's a unique look. Relicing that new finish would simply make it look pastiche and deny the instrument the opportunity to tell its story in the years unfolding. Hope I'm not getting too philosophical here![]()