• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

6 string bass players a question for you

34 or 35"

  • 34

    Votes: 63 53.4%
  • 35

    Votes: 55 46.6%

  • Total voters
    118
Before I built my 6 string I tried a friend's 35, but It was too much neck for my stubby fingers. So I went with a 34" scale and have no regrets. My 5 string fretless, however, is a 34.5" and I notice no difference as to the scale length or the tone or feel of the B string. I say do whatever scale feels best for you. Otherwise you may not want to play it, and that would be a shame.
 
my guess is that 6 string players are a bit more open minded than those who own 4 J's and three P's and look at basses in PJ configuration when they feel wild.

If I was confronted with two similar basses, one in 34" and one in 35" scale,
I would try both and pick the one that feels better. I'd have no preference pulling me towards one or the other, purely based on string length. I've played basses in 34" that hat a massive, pumping B string that felt tight.
I've played basses in 35" that had floppy B strings that did not deliver much in terms of low end rumble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rtav and tjclem
35" scale for me. I have no problem with the tension or C string "brittleness" as I tune all of my basses down one whole step and it does not compromise the clarity and bounce of the B and E strings under that tuning.

Most importantly, however, I have found that 34" scale basses tend to have intonation problems in that you might not be able to get spot-on intonation. If you are playing all over the fretboard, proper intonation is non-negotiable. Since a 35" scale is longer, you have more room to find that correct intonation.
 
I play a lot of chords so my 35" 5 string made them harder to play than my 34" 4 stringers. Of all the 6ers I played, the most comfortable ones were the 34" scale ones (didn't play lower) and I always bought a fatter B for my 34" fiver back when I had it. No problems there, a 130 B will sound very very tight on virtually any 34" scale instrument, a 120, not so much.

As others have said, 34" scale is easily compensated by a fatter string, and in my case, a 35" is uncomfortable to play because some chording shapes become much harder.
 
The C strung is never right to me on a 35". Agree multiscale makes a lot of sense on a 6 string.. But otherwise to me I would want a 34".
Making the frequencies of the C string (and to a lessor degree, the B string) match the rest of the bass, is the biggest reason that I use a compressor pedal. Compressors are dumb as rocks, and don’t recognize the difference between dynamics and spiking frequencies, and a good multi-band comp does a great job of taming ringing and muddiness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kittywithabanjo
34". There is just something more satisfying about that scale length and the feel of the string tension is massively better on a 34". Furthermore, 34" scale doesn't not mean that the low B will be compromised in tone over a 35" bass. My Pedulla Pentabuzz has the most amazing low B I've ever heard (on a wooden bass) and it's a 34".
+1
My pedulla thunderbass is tight and punchy on the B. 34" scale should be a consideration for technique, not sound.
 

Latest posts