butchblack
Life is short. Do good. Find and do what you love.
Does anyone know what the THD is on the 200 combo? I had a model 220 head back in the 80's that was rated at 10% THD. I couldn't run it past 5 on the volume without it farting badly
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Pedro...I know that Bass Gear magazine WILL be getting one of the first units to do an extensive review - the first anywhere. We'll definitely do the 'back story' and get the answers to your questions. Many of the 'come backs' of famous brands were in name only. Not Acoustic USA - they are about as much of a 'real deal' as you can get from a 40 year product revival.
I can tell you pedro that I consider myself a young guy (24), and if it wasn't for transportation limitations (both my cars are compacts), I'd definitely be playing through an Acoustic 215BX (the early 1980s follow-up to the 406). I tried one out a few years back and would've bought it (the seller was asking $100) except that it wouldn't even fit through the door of my car.
I've been fascinated with the 360/361 and with other big Acoustic designs ever since I bought my Acoustic 150 back in 2004. Unfortunately a combination of transportation and finances has prevented me thus far from exploring those tonal options.

I do have to say that because of my current vehicular situation I am also very attracted to "light". I'd love to trade my Avatar B410 (about 95-100lbs) in for an Avatar B410Neo (about 65lbs)...I'm sure there are some young guys like yourself that would be interested. But my observation is that most young guys are into a very different sound, let alone the weight, etc. This is going to be very interesting to see. Hopefully there will enough guys like you to make it a success.
Taken from the description of the B115:
"The B115 features a rock-solid, tuned and ported design with heavy internal bracing, caster sockets and professional spring-loaded touring handles with rubber grips."
Whereas the description of the 410 makes it a point to mention the sealed cab design. I'd assume the port is on the back since it's not visible from the front, maybe with a similar design to something like an ampeg ba-115 (borrowed one for a rehearsal once and it had a circular port on the rear). I haven't had a chance to look at the back of one of these Acoustic cabs yet, so the description might be mistaken too, that's not impossible. I know there were some misprints in the first version of the instruction manuals where they mistakenly refer to the B200 combo as a "practice amp", when that was obviously just left over from the B20 manual. Who knows.
Thanks. I've seen the website. I asked where the port is because I don't remember seeing one when I tried the B200H amp and B115 cabinet briefly at Guitar Center a few weeks ago. Are you sure it's ported at all?
I played several 360/371 rigs in the '70s, so I was GASsed to find a 200H with 4x10 and 1x15 at a local GC last night.
Only 200watts and the tone was underwhelming.
I'll wait on the 360/371 re-issue, thanks.
I never played the originals, but I'm interested. I think there will be a market. Lots of us play genres of music that don't need or want the ultra-modern sizzle. Country, blues, and southern rock for me, for example. I'm playing a Carvin B1500 into one or two Carvin BR115 cabs right now, for example, and loving the tone. And that's obviously not a lightweight setup, although the last setup I had (Genz Benz NeoPak, Shuttle, and Neox cabinets) was definitely lightweight.
So I guess count me in with the folks who haven't played the originals but are interested in the new stuff. I might not be if I hadn't been so impressed with the 200 watt 115 combo I tried out at GC.
Cheers,
Liam