according to the specs, the 360/361 stack weighed in at 155lbs.Interesting. Liam you're aware that the original 360/361 cab tipped the scales at 120lbs or so IIRC?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
according to the specs, the 360/361 stack weighed in at 155lbs.Interesting. Liam you're aware that the original 360/361 cab tipped the scales at 120lbs or so IIRC?
Pedro...I know that Bass Gear magazine WILL be getting one of the first units to do an extensive review - the first anywhere. We'll definitely do the 'back story' and get the answers to your questions. Many of the 'come backs' of famous brands were in name only. Not Acoustic USA - they are about as much of a 'real deal' as you can get from a 40 year product revival.
according to the specs, the 360/361 stack weighed in at 155lbs.
Interesting. Liam you're aware that the original 360/361 cab tipped the scales at 120lbs or so IIRC?
Yeah. I think I read somewhere that the new Acoustic USA cabs will have neodymium speakers. I don't know if the 361 will be included in that though.I knew they were heavy. But seine else mentioned possibly lighter weight cabs for the reissue. We'll see!
Just seemed kinda flat and lifeless. Not much punch or sparkle.
Had to turn it up past halfway to get loud enough. Seems like the 4x10 + 1x15 should have have had more oomph.
I think a lot of the 360's tone was from the massive folded 18 cab.
I didn't think it sounded bad by any means and wouldn't feel bad about gigging one.
They look great and the price is very reasonable.
And to be fair, hardly anything sounds good to me in a GC showroom.
Link?
I just saw these advertised. The prices are ridiculously low.
But would the 200w head be able to hold up in a bar gig?
I played several 360/371 rigs in the '70s, so I was GASsed to find a 200H with 4x10 and 1x15 at a local GC last night.
Only 200watts and the tone was underwhelming.
I'll wait on the 360/371 re-issue, thanks.

That was rudebottomend. Try this link Pedro [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
YepThanks I'm assuming its the thread 'Good, Bad, Ugly'.
Wow... thats weird. I had a completely different experience trying out the amp. I just couldn't believe at how musical and alive the EQ section sounded. The amp had a good balance of it's own tone while at the same time allowing me to dial in...ME. I haven't gigged with one but I cranked it up to an acceptable volume in the store and I dont believe it would have any problem keeping up with a moderatly loud band. I summerized my impression on the Acoustic forum if you want to go there and read about what I found. I also had the chance to hear a real 360 rig for the first time within a few days of trying the new Acoustics. There is a thread about that as well.
Yep
if you frequented the ACC Forum more you would already know what threads bottomend and I talk about over here. haha![]()
That was rudebottomend. Try this link Pedro [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
I wasn't trying to be rude. I figured that people with Acoustic interest already knew about the forum and I had posted it a few times in other threads so I didn't wanna come off as a salesman etc. My bad.
New stuff;
http://unofficialacousticcontrolcorpmessageboard.yuku.com/topic/1678
Old Stuff;
http://unofficialacousticcontrolcorpmessageboard.yuku.com/topic/1687
lets see how popular these are in 30 years,lol. (not) what happened to the speakers? that was 2/3 of thier sound. they are tiny. johnny a (former 360folded horn cab owner)
FWIW, I think the 'rude' comment was made in jest. I certainly never thought it was anything but an oversight.