Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Adam Clayton Jazz
- Thread starter Indiana Mike
- Start date
.
I used to have a MIM Jazz that looked exactly like that except it didn't have the blocked neck. I like the looks of it but I don't understand why a lot of their sigs are more expensive than the American Standard offerings.
I'm not following your logic here. If you're inferring that Clayton, who receives royalties as co-writer on a large body of U2's recorded work (and which Dusty Hill, who is co-credited as writer on an overwhelming portion of ZZ Top's work no doubt shares a similar status with) and as a result of this personal fortune therefore discounts his percentage of endorsement royalties on an instrument that bears his name manufactured by a large multinational corporation...I'm afraid that dog doesn't hunt.
I certainly don't begrudge either artist the slice that they make from sales of their endorsements (whatever that may be), but for various subjective reasons I will not be a contributor to the pile. Again, YMMV.
D
I like it. Nice color, nice bridge, I dig the blocks… have no info about scale ratio but seems to be flatter than a 63.
Looks like a "vintage" J with some improvements.
Don't understand why Fender still use those heavy tuners instead of a lightweight one.
Hipshot makes a lollipop version of their Ultralites models. It wouldn't be difficult to use them.
Looks like a "vintage" J with some improvements.
Don't understand why Fender still use those heavy tuners instead of a lightweight one.
Hipshot makes a lollipop version of their Ultralites models. It wouldn't be difficult to use them.
Last edited:
One of the all time great bass players
. Fender are a great company with excellent customer support (with Bono
on the board of directors). whats not to like
. Fender are a great company with excellent customer support (with Bono on the board of directors). whats not to like
TrueInvalid Link Removed
Having started the other thread on this bass, I feel the need to chime in.
So does this *LOOK* like a cool bass? Actually, yeah. It' got some nice cosmetic appointments: Sherwood green (something of a scarce/cool color), moto pickguard, block inlays and a matching headstock. I'd actually be interested in checking one out if the opportunity presents itself. I like Jazz basses, and I happen to like Sherwood green.
Does my interest in this have anything to do with Adam Clayton? Not really. He's laid down some hook filled grooves for U2 over the years. "With or without you" may have a pretty straightforward bass line, but it's the heart of that song. And that song was HUGE. Do I consider myself a U2 fan? Not really.
I suspect that the critics of this particular bass are also those who generally criticize signature model instruments in general. To which I say "Don't judge a book by it's cover". Judge the instrument on it's merits: playability, tone and build quality.
As for this instrument as a business decision? I suspect that there's a lot of marketing value for Fender to be associated with an act like U2. Let's face facts: U2 is one of the biggest bands in the world. And for Fender to be able to offer a signature instrument for a member of U2 is a big deal for them. Fender is in business to make money. If Adam Clayton's name helps them sell some basses? Then they probably see that as a sound business decision.
So does this *LOOK* like a cool bass? Actually, yeah. It' got some nice cosmetic appointments: Sherwood green (something of a scarce/cool color), moto pickguard, block inlays and a matching headstock. I'd actually be interested in checking one out if the opportunity presents itself. I like Jazz basses, and I happen to like Sherwood green.
Does my interest in this have anything to do with Adam Clayton? Not really. He's laid down some hook filled grooves for U2 over the years. "With or without you" may have a pretty straightforward bass line, but it's the heart of that song. And that song was HUGE. Do I consider myself a U2 fan? Not really.
I suspect that the critics of this particular bass are also those who generally criticize signature model instruments in general. To which I say "Don't judge a book by it's cover". Judge the instrument on it's merits: playability, tone and build quality.
As for this instrument as a business decision? I suspect that there's a lot of marketing value for Fender to be associated with an act like U2. Let's face facts: U2 is one of the biggest bands in the world. And for Fender to be able to offer a signature instrument for a member of U2 is a big deal for them. Fender is in business to make money. If Adam Clayton's name helps them sell some basses? Then they probably see that as a sound business decision.
Judging by the specs, I would say it's almost like a American Deluxe Jazz, except with passive pickups and a custom color.
