• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Ambient/Post-Rock/Textural bass playing thread

So tempted...
80FF0284-ECD2-4320-807D-A38E9B14E222.jpeg
 
Had a scrutator but got rid of it...
the setup with it with preamp and filter etc is awesome but I couldn’t get it to act like a quasi wah with expression enough... and although I liked it realised I had no use for a bit crusher in my band and was downsizing to a mostly band board.

of all the bit crushers I think it’s features are above and beyond. Though that new ehx one seems similar even if the video demo on it is pretty bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ugly_bassplayer
For the sake of argument -- and I say this as a huge Bill Bruford fan, someone who's admired his work for pretty much the entirety of his career, and who especially loves his willingness to value the music over his own ego -- I will say that on occasion he has done some things where the concept and the execution don't quite elide, and so I only find them "interesting" as failed experiments.

The most obvious examples are the places where he uses metric modulation and the drums are the only instrument doing so (e.g., "Cerulean Sea" from the Bruford Levin Upper Extremities album), or any time he tries to play swing (e.g., "Sparkle" from Jamaaladeen Tacuma's Renaissance Man album).

But the fact that he's willing to go out there and release a failed experiment [sic] with his musicality and integrity intact endears him to me all the more, so don't take this as a criticism per se.

I have been keeping up with this thread for the most part - haven't been able to listen to people's stuff but still plan to. I've been busy with work but I guess that's a good thing.

Wanted to post this video here - it relates to Bill Bruford in the context of John Wetton and UK - it was posted in a thread on UK a few weeks back so you may have seen it. Quoting the person who posted it, "Relevant bits start at 14:40 and it gets [specific] around 22:38" - I don't want to bias your perception of John Wetton's comments so I changed it to "specific". This might be off-topic here, but at least it seemed relevant to something that came up!



(Actually, the video is set up so that you have to watch it on YouTube)
 
  • Like
Reactions: JES
Care to share an example/sample of this particular set up??

Just consider the logic. You can record you accompanying a loop into another looper to build and deconstruct things. You dont have to worry about having machine like timing...but you need to make a loop that feels close. This way you can always build into another looper and clear out the old...you can also build under a loop and fade out the other or take a part of a loop into the other. You always have a looper to build into or behind this way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spectrum