What’s Devi ever?I think it's devi ever
Hasn’t heard that name for ages since a few feuds back (2016 ish?) and you made me just go read 20 minutes of reddit that was just... wow... doesn’t seem business is Devi’s strength...
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
What’s Devi ever?I think it's devi ever
What’s Devi ever?
Hasn’t heard that name for ages since a few feuds back (2016 ish?) and you made me just go read 20 minutes of reddit that was just... wow... doesn’t seem business is Devi’s strength...
Fired up my eurorack for the first time in months. Was fun to just make weird noises
View attachment 4085154
I bought a few back in the day... like 2008ish... never played well with my active bass except the hyperion... hyperion was ok kind of a cross between muff and a noisy super fuzz... all the others I tried either had the active bloom decay thing issue or were just so noisy and unusable in a normal context. All of them have massive bass loss too, ended up running them through a ls2... anyway pretty much gave up and only semi followed for a few years til people got so mad about the Kickstarter project loss thing... then the dwarf craft thing... *shrugs*tbh, i never got the devi ever thing. to me it was ton of different fuzz pedals that always sounded the same in sound files.
How would you compare the creative work flow\process of the Linn vs the HS keyboard.linnstrument experiment. four microtonal hydrasynth patches.layered improv not great art. just show and tell.
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
How would you compare the creative work flow\process of the Linn vs the HS keyboard.
I believe they both have poly after touch?
Plus\minus of each approach ?
I think the biggest reservation I have about grid type stuff like the LS is just memorizing what the hell my configs are. But I'm guessing if you come up with something you stick with that works for you, it gets easy.with the caveat that i'm really new to the linnstrument . . .
hs keyboard: piano/synth technique; internal sounds
hs desktop: 24 pads, you can set them up in different ways. i have them set up like a 3-string bass in fourths; internal sounds
both the keys and the pads are pat
ls: touch surface with 128 "pads." you can set them up in different ways. i have them set up like an 8-string bass in fourths; no internal sounds.
in mpe the ls's surface goes beyond pat in that it sends that information, but also sends *per note* y coordinate information and *per note* pitch bend, so you can bend one pitch while having another stay fixed or have two pitches bend in *different directions* and at different times.
on the ls you have three ways to deal with control a sound: down, horizontally and vertically.
on the hs you have one way: down (but see later about wheels and macro knobs)
to me the ls seems very touch sensitive (it does have different levels you can choose).
the example i put up has a few things going on: held notes where i'm slighting changing the pitch per note, y axis opening/closing a filter and changing delay time, and using pat to change some fm ratios, etc.
pros:
hs keyboard is really good if you want to play regular piano-tech chords and lines (though i'm extremely sub-par on this front). the pitch wheel and mod wheel can be programmed to control other parameters, so a two-hand technique can get a lot of control over sounds. the macro knobs are also amazing in terms of sound design/control.
hs desktop is great an expander or doubler of the keyboard version. the pads are cool on their own, but a bit limited; still they can do cool stuff. harder to think of chords on this for me. the macro knobs are also amazing in terms of sound design/control.
the ls is just a controller, but a brilliant one for me so far. since it responds well to gesture and player input, i find it pretty intuitive. haven't really delved in to the chord thing yet. there is a lot of depth that i haven't gotten into yet; i'm basically scratching the surface. it's doing what i thought i wanted to do with it. now i need to program hs sounds to respond to it.
the way i plan on using it is with the hs desktop in live situations.
I think the biggest reservation I have about grid type stuff like the LS is just memorizing what the hell my configs are. But I'm guessing if you come up with something you stick with that works for you, it gets easy.
Makes perfect sense.with the caveat that i'm really new to the linnstrument . . .
hs keyboard: piano/synth technique; internal sounds
hs desktop: 24 pads, you can set them up in different ways. i have them set up like a 3-string bass in fourths; internal sounds
both the keys and the pads are pat
ls: touch surface with 128 "pads." you can set them up in different ways. i have them set up like an 8-string bass in fourths; no internal sounds.
in mpe the ls's surface goes beyond pat in that it sends that information, but also sends *per note* y coordinate information and *per note* pitch bend, so you can bend one pitch while having another stay fixed or have two pitches bend in *different directions* and at different times.
on the ls you have three ways to deal with control a sound: down, horizontally and vertically.
on the hs you have one way: down (but see later about wheels and macro knobs)
to me the ls seems very touch sensitive (it does have different levels you can choose).
the example i put up has a few things going on: held notes where i'm slighting changing the pitch per note, y axis opening/closing a filter and changing delay time, and using pat to change some fm ratios, etc.
pros:
hs keyboard is really good if you want to play regular piano-tech chords and lines (though i'm extremely sub-par on this front). the pitch wheel and mod wheel can be programmed to control other parameters, so a two-hand technique can get a lot of control over sounds. the macro knobs are also amazing in terms of sound design/control.
hs desktop is great an expander or doubler of the keyboard version. the pads are cool on their own, but a bit limited; still they can do cool stuff. harder to think of chords on this for me. the macro knobs are also amazing in terms of sound design/control.
the ls is just a controller, but a brilliant one for me so far. since it responds well to gesture and player input, i find it pretty intuitive. haven't really delved in to the chord thing yet. there is a lot of depth that i haven't gotten into yet; i'm basically scratching the surface. it's doing what i thought i wanted to do with it. now i need to program hs sounds to respond to it.
the way i plan on using it is with the hs desktop in live situations.
Life Is Unfair pedals.
Based on these listings, it sure seems that way.
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Heck, the name is buried right on the website listings.
Dark Boost
From some googling, it might just be Devi’s name attached, and not actually Devi’s company.
the ls is just a controller, but a brilliant one for me so far. since it responds well to gesture and player input, i find it pretty intuitive. haven't really delved in to the chord thing yet. there is a lot of depth that i haven't gotten into yet; i'm basically scratching the surface. it's doing what i thought i wanted to do with it. now i need to program hs sounds to respond to it.
the way i plan on using it is with the hs desktop in live situations.
This is exactly right. The big thing is that preprogrammed sounds often sound weird with it because the approach to the Y axis (usually the mod wheel) is very different when it's a finger on a pad vs a, well, mod wheel. But it's much more fun for controlling synths.
But it was the first synth controller that "made sense" to me as someone with 1 semester of piano and decades of bass.