i'm super impressed with the 112av and 212av, they sound absolutely amazing!
probably what i'm going to go with, with my 700RB ii.
probably what i'm going to go with, with my 700RB ii.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Try the Mesa Traditional 610.A sealed triple chambered 610 without a horn is what I want from Ampeg.
Because that would mean including an audio transformer in the cab(heavy and expensive), using dual voice coil speakers (expensive to get the ball rolling), or a series/parallel switch on the wiring of the drivers.Why cant they make a switch on the cabinet that runs through some form of circuitry that enables you to switch between different ohm settings. Then we could set it however we need to based on our setups. Is this even possible? If so I guess that would mean they wouldn't sell as many cabinets. If it is possible how would one go about making a switch box that goes in between the head and cabinet that would all out you switch ohm settings? Seems with today technology it could be possible.
The later production Ampeg B25B cabs had a 16/4 ohm switch on them. Dunno if any other Ampeg cab ever did? As hinted at above an 8 ohm 4x10 that uses 8 ohm speakers could be easily made 8/2 ohm switchable - but Ampeg is fond of 32 ohm speakers so I dunno about their 4x10's?Why cant they make a switch on the cabinet that runs through some form of circuitry that enables you to switch between different ohm settings.
He did and you can. Only problem there is I don't like the sound as much as running it in spec. A bit more compressed, a bit less "open" sounding. It's a small difference but I'm not fond of it.I thought even the designer of the SVT has said you can run it all day long at 8ohms with the single Ampeg 410?
Since you have Ampeg's "ear"He did and you can. Only problem there is I don't like the sound as much as running it in spec. A bit more compressed, a bit less "open" sounding. It's a small difference but I'm not fond of it.
I'm sure they know there is a small handful of people who want an 8 ohm tap, but the SVT still sells so well after all these years that there's no real incentive for them to do it.Since you have Ampeg's "ear"maybe you can push for that extra 8 ohm tap? Need a 2.66 ohm one too - three stacked 1x12's, Woo
!
<<<Enter almost anything JimmyM has ever said>>>
Aw man, thanks for making my day! Respect back!Completely off topic, but JimmyM, you're one of my very favorite TBers. Thank you for always having reasonable things to say, whether people agree or not. Much respect, sir.
Jacob
Considered means I thought about if cutting the 8x10 in half would work but decided after doing some research it would not work. Which I assume the R&D team at Ampeg has done in the past. They know everyone loves the 8x10 and if they could recreate that in a smaller package they would.
Aw man, thanks for making my day! Respect back!
Jealous? We'll let you be pivot boy if you want!You two should get a room.![]()
I don't know how anyone could ask for anything more than what my Ampeg SVT Heritage 410 can give in the low end. This Cab is fantastic and gives me everything tonally I could ask. Always get compliments for my sound wherever I play. I have it paired with my Ampeg SVT 3-Pro head and its tonal heaven.
That's a lovely story.
![]()

I thought it was called for. And darn funny.That might have been a little uncalled for Jim. Just sayin'![]()