No.
The first Radiator is Powered while the other operates Passively in reaction.
FYI, The owner's reference guide infers both drivers are active. See attached.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
No.
The first Radiator is Powered while the other operates Passively in reaction.
No.
The first Radiator is Powered while the other operates Passively in reaction.
FYI, The owner's reference guide infers both drivers are active. See attached.
This is my first GK. I'm very happy with it, and it's very easy for me to dial in a good sound. I still have some Ampegs--a '68 B-15N, '72 B-15S, a '67 Jet guitar amp, a Sound Cube and even a Buster, the last two being battery/AC practice amps. Then there are several Ampeg basses, a guitar, and a bunch of pedals. I won't be divested from Ampeg until I'm cold in the ground.
After riding along with this. I remember doing silly things too! My tri-amped system
![]()
Just kidding, you know.But I thought we got it from two relevant sources (not the OP) and one of them had looked in the ports of his own box. I actually had written a whole response challenging the theory that it was horn-loaded box since there isn't much room and I couldn't figure where the 'mouth' was. Then I didn't post it because I thought I might look foolish (imagine!) and erased it. I've seen plenty enough cab designs that appear and/or claim to be horn-loaded but aren't truly operating as horns, and I was afraid that it might a one of those cases. I looked at both the sales lit and the owner's manuals on-line ages ago (page 1) and there was nothing there about a rear-loaded folded horn. But then, there was virtually nothing about the bi-amp inputs either, and that knowledge could have actually been useful, as opposed to more marketing hype. Anyhoo...hadn't meant to cast aspersions.
![]()
Since I saw the Grateful DeadUm er - Since when did you lose your mind?
.
Since I saw the Grateful Dead
LOL.
"(NOT the OP)",
Very Funny.
Actually the Isovent is NOT a Horn Loaded Cabinet.
Basically the chamber containing the clamshell loaded 15s is standard ported bass cab.
Yes it has an open mouth but the chamber containing the 15s is NOT a folded horn by any means.
Just a slightly odd shaped box with two ports - one on each side of the speaker cones.
The 210s sit in an upper sealed chamber.
I am not saying it's a folded horn. My contention is it's an experiment that is caught somewhere between ported, folded horn, and tapped horn. IMHO it's neither of these in a pure sense. It's closest to what we commonly call a sub scoop.
It's most like an EV T18, EV SH-1800, or JBL 4530 except it uses isobarik loading.
T18
View attachment 3681792 View attachment 3681793
SH-1800 Basically the same cab at the T18, but different woofer in a different orientation.
View attachment 3681784
4530
View attachment 3681794 View attachment 3681785
Electro Voice SH-1810L-ER literature say the box operates as a horn for much of it's range and works as a ported box in the low frequencies. The box is described as a "SubScoop".
I believe the JBL 4530 is supposed to work the opposite. The driver functions as direct radiators at the top of the cabs range and the horn takes over at the bottom of the range. The length of the horn is much longer on the JBLs.
See my other post Ampeg Isovent - Jack Plate Circuit Board.
And here's what the inside of a 4530 looks like.
View attachment 3681786
Here is the rear of the cab to show the ports.
View attachment 3682010
So the front part where 15 is connected does not open in the the rear chamber?
The baffle goes all the way to the back or bottom of the cab like this?
View attachment 3682004
Instead of opening into a port like this?
![]()
My ports are on the front on either side of the 215s.
So how are things going with your friend who's working on the IsoVent? Have you made any determinations about your theories on the jackplate/filter/circuit?
My ports are on the front on either side of the 215s.
Really? I don't think you are familiar with that cabinet, certainly not crossed over to get rid of the gank in the mid bass and up.
Something else that's misleading is that the written specs do not match the published on axis graph, which is why it may appear better in the low end than it actually is, and also why it works better at a 100Hz crossover frequency.
https://www.electrovoice.com/binary/T18_Engineering_Data_Sheet.PDF
If you look at the written specs, it claims -3dB at 45Hz and -10dB at 33Hz. Yet, it you do the math from the FR graph, and use the average sensitivity from the graph over the published 250Hz bandwidth, you will quickly discover that the average sensitivity is just about 101dB, the -3dB point is 60Hz and the -10dB point is 40hz. (the absolute sensitivity does not matter as everything is relative in this spec)
The other thing that should be striking is what's happening in the mid bass (remember that I had mentioned that the mid bass artifacts are a particular challenge with many of these "folded horn, horn loaded vented", and other non-conventional designs???). Ignoring the 4th order 250Hz LPF that's been inserted into the graph, look at what's happening at 100 to say 250Hz (extrapolated w/out the LPF obviously). There's a 10dB peak at 150Hz (it's probably higher and wider, extending upwards to 250Hz), which is EXACTLY the type of artifact you are experiencing with your proverbial "F-bomb". A conventional bass reflex cabinet with appropriate tuning does not have this artifact.
All the "wide eyed infatuation, arguing and obtuse (plus being totally incorrect) justification can't change the physics of whats happening acoustically. The engineering relationship is basically the same as gain-bandwidth product, where you trade-off gain for flatter and broader bandwidth. What's ironic is that the math is very similar to that in electronic filter theory and in fact we use filter theory models when describing what's happening.
This is also why I suggested that you listen to those who do know more about this than you do. You might actually learn something. Your tank experience means nothing in this field, zip, zero, nada, and I think you have finally proved this to us as well.