We just upgraded from a Ampeg 210 combo to a Euphonic Audio Iamp 800 and a EA 210. Then a line out to the board.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
This reminds me of someting that happened to me at a church I attended about 15 years ago. The church had moved from banquet hall type building to a traditional church. There were "some" issues with the acoustics of the sanctuary but nothing insurmountable. Unfortunately, there was more emphasis on asthetics than functionality. So wall treatments (even curtains) were not an option.I've never quite understood the "all amps off the stage" mentality. It seems like a half-baked compromise to the grey hairs (of which I am one) who seem to regularly carp about modern worship music. Maybe it's an "out of sign out of mind" thing.
We have a seasonal attendance change here in the 1000 island region of new york.Winter head count 20ish. summer retreat maybe 100. I play a gibson triumph.And the only equipment we need is MACKIE. Powered speakers.Mixer,and most importantly powered SUB....HOLY THUMP... 3 mic's, V-drums,fender rhodes keyboard,bass,accoustic guitar
This set up works great.And the looks really fit.
PRAISE THE LORD AND PASS THE TUNER.......ALG
Agree on all points. We have a combination of IEM's and amps at my church. I've quit using the IEM's completely since I got rid of my Eden gear in favor of Genz Benz, mostly because the GB gear I have is just so much easier to transport. I use a Neo-pak with either a Neox 212 or 112, depending on my mood and how awake I am when I have to load up at home. The 112 of course is easier to move, and has plenty of volume, but the 212 at equal volume has a better feel on stage, and it's not much more trouble to loud in. Like you, I change things up a lot depending on the song. The ability to overdrive the tube really lets me do some of the fun, rock type songs on my VJ. It sounds great with a pick. When I really want versatility, I take the 1200 and make use of channel switching on the fly via the footswitch. But most Sundays its the Neo-pak and 112. It's just a great church-rig. If GB ever comes out with a 112 combo with a Neo-Pak in it (HELLO HASBEEN!The whole sound / PA thing seems to polarize opinion. The whole "My way or the Highway" mentality resides permanently in the ongoing sound system / worship team "issues" that perpetually come around.
Fortunately / unfortunately our church will not likely force this type of decision on us. Our A/V budget last year was $0.00! We'll need new mains speakers, mains amps, a decent set of piano mics, wall acoustic treatment, a new keyboard, compressors, training for the soundguys etc. (the basics) before we'll ever drop megabucks on a sophisticated IEM system.
I've never quite understood the "all amps off the stage" mentality. It seems like a half-baked compromise to the grey hairs (of which I am one) who seem to regularly carp about modern worship music. Maybe it's an "out of sign out of mind" thing.
I've been enjoying my Genz Benz GBE600 / Neox 212 rig so much these days, I think I'd really miss it as I'm relying on it a lot to generate the different tones I'm using for different songs.
Well if we ever build a new church, it'll be engineered a LOT more towards the praise and worship aspect, as opposed to just "getting it done cheap", because they see the problem with having a 4 ft rasied/wooden/hollow stage about 6-8 feet from the front row now.

I use my Portabass 250 into a Yamaha 15" monitor that's left over now that we've switched to Hearback in-ears.
If GB ever comes out with a 112 combo with a Neo-Pak in it (HELLO HASBEEN!), I'd be hard pressed to not buy it.
Our church went to the "clean stage" idea a year ago, and I have mixed emotions about it. The sound from the in-ears is great, but I still miss the feeling of having an amp behind me and the ambiance of sound moving air, not just for bass but for everything. Part of the reason for going direct, we were told, was to contain stage volume. However, the problem for the rhythm section was NOT the volume of our amps - it was the volume of the horn section and having the choir mics cranked up so far that everything bled into them. And that hasn't changed.
Stage volume is still high, even though all the electric instruments are being fed back to the horns and singers through two wedges and two overhead monitors. The choir mics are cranked so high that every whisper and page turn sounds like a freight train. I have to keep my IEM cranked to block out the sound from the wedges and, sometimes,from the house. Add to this that although they spent $5 million on the church, they didn't put enough money into the sound system. Yes, we have 16 channels in our monitor feed, but eight of them are for vocals. Although we have horns, wodwinds and a small string section, they don't come through the monitor mix. So If I want to hear them, I have to leave the choir feed wide open.
I don't understand why the onstage volume from the monitors is still so high, and I don't understand why they couldn't have spent an extra $100K to set up the IEMs better. I won't even go into the horror that happens when the substitute soundman runs things.
Now that I've complained, here's my setup: Lakland 55-94 and an NS Design WAV4 EUB. I run both through a Radial BassBone, which goes straight to the board. The WAV has a K&K Pure Preamp before the Bone as an impedance matcher. Before going direct, I used a Genz-Benz NeoX 400 with a line out to the PA.
How does that work for you, using a PA wedge for your cab?
I've been interested in doing that myself.
we've switched to Hearback in-ears.
![]()