There are more complex overtones with a full scale, but no one can tell the difference between my Mustang or my P-Bass in the band mix. Slapping is a little tougher on a shortie too.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
No.is there a downside to short scale basses?
There are more complex overtones with a full scale, but no one can tell the difference between my Mustang or my P-Bass in the band mix. Slapping is a little tougher on a shortie too.
Hey, guys. Let's get this over with: I'm a girl. I have small hands. I can manage on a 34", but I feel my abilities might be better translated on a short scale bass. And maybe my left hand won't ache quite as much after playing something like "Face the Face" or a similar stretch-on-the-really-low-frets song.
However, I'm wondering...is there a downside to short scale basses? I'm particularly wondering about sound. Is anything impacted by the shorter neck? Should I learn to deal with a 34"?
Discuss, friends.
There is no difference for tuning. This is Bull Crap.For me there are some small disadvantages. I use most of the time 34" regular Precisions and sometimes medium scale (Rickenbacker) and short scales (Squire Precision 30" and Epiphone Rivoli). Because of the lower string tension the term "precision" is gone. Accurate tuning is not so easy, if you tend to "hang on" the strings with your grip hand, which is no problem on long scales. But hey, listen to isolated McCartney Beatles bass tracks on Höfner basses.
All depends on string choice.There is no difference for tuning. This is Bull Crap.
Here's a sideways thought - if lower positions are a problem, consider a 5-string with a low B. It allows you to play "first position" up in the middle of the neck without the same reach required.
That's a good solution only if you are willing to put the time in to really learn the 5. By that I mean not only learning to implement the B in everything you do (otherwise there's no reach advantage) but going back and relearning every song you know. Some people this isn't much of a challenge. I wish I was one. For others like myself it never felt natural at all and really changed the way I played for the worse.
Not that I'm disputing what you're saying, but IME it's not as easy as it's made out to be in threads like this regarding moving to a medium or short scale.
I guess I'm one who adapted easily to the transition. One of my goals in learning a 5 was to be able to go back and forth between 4 & 5 easily, and I've achieved that goal with a lot of practice and live experience. Maybe I've just forgotten how hard it was.
I suppose she wouldn't know unless she tried it.
here is no instability if three full wraps can be achieved on the posts.All depends on string choice.
Any scale with the wrong strings can have tubing instability problems.
Putting long scale strings on a short scale can result in outer wrapping going round the tuning pegs.
Wrong tension, slipping( instability), shortened string life, etc come from this.
Of course thats operator error for using the wrong strings, but it could happen.
Man if it works for you that's great. I never had such luck.nt
here is no instability if three full wraps can be achieved on the posts.
The only disadvantage I've run across with short scale basses, the limited string options, as compared to long scale basses. The sounds, and playability with short scales, no disadvantages here.
There is no difference for tuning. This is Bull Crap.