Ash or alder.
Maple neck and fretboard.
Black.
5 string.
J or P, passive.
As few knobs as possible.
Can't help it.
Maple neck and fretboard.
Black.
5 string.
J or P, passive.
As few knobs as possible.
Can't help it.

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

That's all the push I needed.Oh come on, I know the name says it all but we want to see that fabulous collection of yours.![]()
^^^This...My ‘type’ seems to be 4-string, passive, ‘Jazz’ neck. I’ve had a number of active and/or > 4 string basses and all have gone out the door.
Definitely not my type, but I always liked your collection.

What is the model name of this particular Gibson?
I guess it's finally time to admit that the only basses that stick around long term here are ash body basses. Some of them are heavy norther, some are super light swamp. Honestly, most of the time it's ash/maple, provided that they have a good midrange voice and aren't too scooped. I think for solid body fretted basses, Im really only comfortable with the attack and frequency presentation of ash, when it's done right. I always want to love alder, mahogany etc. as a body wood, but 9/10 it just doesn't quite sit right. 4, 5, 6, J, P, humbuckers, bolt on, neck thru, theyre all just ash. Minus that nice Koa Taylor in the back.
Anyone else find that they gravitate to one type of wood for a body or fingerboard? Besides neck wood, the body and board seem (to my ears) to have most impact on tone. Unless you're one of those that believe 'all woods sound the same and anyways, its all in the fingers', in which case, perhaps this thread may not be for you
View attachment 5274288
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]What is the model name of this particular Gibson?