Bob Lee (QSC)
In case you missed it, I work for QSC Audio!
- Jul 3, 2001
- 12,668
- 2,036
- 67
- Disclosures
- Former Technical Communications Developer, QSC Audio
Am I the only one who thinks that PWN = Instant loss of credibility?
No, you're not.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Am I the only one who thinks that PWN = Instant loss of credibility?
No, you're not.
I have never seen a more user friendly mp3 player with more space for less money.
lowsound
The fact that you use a Mac is fine, and I have no problem with it. Just realize that any problems you had with a windows machine may very well be your own fault. It is not difficult to keep the machine clean and running smoothly.
You mean return Office to Mac? Invalid Link Removed
It is rather easy to use the click wheel while driving. Push button for navigation? Well it would have made them just like every other mp3 player on the market. Gotta do something to stand out. The touch is even easier to use.
lowsound
People seem to think that Macs are so much better for recording (not saying you do). However, just the other day a friend was telling me how he can do remote recording with his Mac at a whopping 8 channels at 44kHz/16bits. Meanwhile, with my 4 year old Sony VAIO PC running XP, I can record 14 channels at 96kHz/24bits. That's only due to a limitation of the optical connection between my Focusrite OctoPre and MOTU 828 mkII. At 44kHz, I can record 18 channels. This is my portable recording rig too.
- Dave
So you took eight paragraphs to prove that macs are more user friendly. I already knew that. Nothing like buying a new camera, plugging it into my computer and not having to install any new software in order to download the pictures. Wait, I also did that with my printer and video camera as well.
lowsound
It's always been easy to upgrade stuff like RAM and hard drives in a Mac. Plug them in and go. Motherboards and processors are another matter. This is deliberate on Apple's part though - not to frustrate the more advanced user who likes to tinker, more to make life easier for the less advanced user who just wants things to work. With Apple controlling both the hardware and the software, one is made to work specifically with the other. None of the PC user's worry about having the correct drivers, BIOS settings and so on. Yes, a 7-year-old Mac will pretty much be obsolete now, but so will a 7-year-old PC - good luck installing XP on a machine like that.
I have a similar story. I bought a SONY VAIO laptop in August and spent a little less than two grand. Mind you I maxed every hardware option I could for it, par the extended battery. I now have 240GB of memory on my hard drive, 2.4 gigs of RAM, Vistahmm
, Intel Dual Core Processors, and a 17 inch 1080 Hi-Def Screen. Not to mention the best graphic and sound cards that SONY offered.
My friend Aubrey spent $2400 on a Mac in March and every single piece of hardware in my Sony is more powerful or better than her Mac.
Our usual line of arguments.
"My Mac is better than your PC"
"Mines new and all my hardware is better than yours"
"So? Mine is better and video and music editing?"
"Erm... here look..."
Suffice to say she's saving for a VAIO.
I have a similar story. I bought a SONY VAIO laptop in August and spent a little less than two grand. Mind you I maxed every hardware option I could for it, par the extended battery. I now have 240GB of memory on my hard drive, 2.4 gigs of RAM, Vistahmm
, Intel Dual Core Processors, and a 17 inch 1080 Hi-Def Screen. Not to mention the best graphic and sound cards that SONY offered.
My friend Aubrey spent $2400 on a Mac in March and every single piece of hardware in my Sony is more powerful or better than her Mac.
Our usual line of arguments.
"My Mac is better than your PC"
"Mines new and all my hardware is better than yours"
"So? Mine is better and video and music editing?"
"Erm... here look..."
Suffice to say she's saving for a VAIO.
That's always been my experience when dealing with computers in the $2K+ range.I have an 8GB Sansa as well. I love it! My only complaint? Slow boot time. That's it!Ever try a Sansa? I got an 8 GB one two years ago for roughly $80 new. Came with video, radio, and a host of other functions I never used. I didn't have to format my media. Simply C&P from your My Music folder into its folder in my computer (when you plug it in)
I know, its only 8 GB but you get a lot of cool stuff with it (including a light up version of the iPod's scroll wheel) and its built like a tank. I thought iPods were nice but I couldn't work the touch scroll wheel. My Sansa solved that problem with the plastic scroll wheel that lights up. Its built like a tank, I've abused this thing so much and it still works, hell its even gone through the wash!
Also, unlike the iPod it utilizes a flash drive instead of a hard drive. Every move an iPod around a lot and it skips? Or got out in freezing cold weather and have it freeze or skip? The Sansa doesn't. Also, for some reason I'm able to store more than my sisters 8GB iPod Nano. My Sansa is only a few millimeters bigger than the nano.
PS Sansa has great customer service to, from what I remember. Mine was damaged during shipping (entire box was crushed, I can't believe USPS even delivered it) Sansa paid for shipping both ways and sent me a new unit ASAP.
Needless to say, with 2000$ you get a decent Mac machine and an average Windows running machine.
Am I the only one who thinks that PWN = Instant loss of credibility? Has the world, indeed, passed me by.