• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

anyone not like musicman basses?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have 8 basses and when I'm going into a new situation (new band, audition, gig at a new venue or session with someone I don't know) I always bring my 1998 Sterling.

Its by far the most versatile bass that I own, it plays very well but I advise against cranking the EQ knobs on any music man. The resulting tone is almost a cliché caricature of the bass' true potential.
 
TonyLevinbass.jpg


Custom SR5, built for Tony Levin....although he actually ended up with a maple fingerboard.

I'd be very surprised to read an interview with TL regarding aftermarket pickups in any of his Stingrays....anyone have that?

I've talked to him a number of times about his basses and he certainly seems perfectly content with factory specs. I suppose it's possible....but I'd like to read it.

Jack
 
Cons:

-They sound is too active and get lost in the mix when playing live, and it's all electronics with no wood sound - just as artificial as it gets.

I've never had issues with my SR5 cutting through or sounding funny.

-Most 5s strings are way over 9 lbs, which is too heavy for me.

They do weigh a ton

-G string on StingRays have lower volume.

Never had an issue with that. Maybe the bass(es) you played were not set up properly?

-G string on StingRay 5s easily runs off the fretboard.

???:hmm: I've been playing SR5's since 95 and never had issues with keeping the g-string on the board.
 
This is absolutely a valid issue/feature that has been acknowledged by Sterling Ball no less:

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]



By the way, I have three Stingrays that I love.

Thanks for the link; very interesting, and there have been others too I saw.

With the exception of the 'g' string issue,

Now to that amazingly brilliant quote...:eyebrow:

What the *&%$ does that mean?

First off, it's not a deal-breaker for me; I think the Sterling and EB/MM in general is a superb instrument, hand-built quality at a fair price, and mine gets a LOT of gig time.

But there IS an issue with the output at the G string, it IS weaker, and must be compensated for.

I think the Sterlings (and 'Rays apparently) would be a better bass without this difference in output, but as they are, they are still top rate, so no slaggin' on MM for me; I have great love...

But-- Play real, and the "vegetable" thing is as layum as it gets if you ask me....:ninja:
 
I advise against cranking the EQ knobs on any music man. The resulting tone is almost a cliché caricature of the bass' true potential.

+1 , im not a huge fan of the EQ points on the SRs, well, 3 band anyway. Both mine end up being flat the vast majority of the time.


TonyLevinbass.jpg


Custom SR5, built for Tony Levin....although he actually ended up with a maple fingerboard.

I'd be very surprised to read an interview with TL regarding aftermarket pickups in any of his Stingrays....anyone have that?

I've talked to him a number of times about his basses and he certainly seems perfectly content with factory specs. I suppose it's possible....but I'd like to read it.

Jack

Bloody gorgeous bass! Would be nice if EB released some non-limited edition basses with nice tops and no PG.
 
After playing Kramers, Fenders, Rick's, Aria's, Carvins, and many other brands over the years - I finally own a 2002 Stingray 4 (bought off the 'bay for $600!!! )
Its light weight and does it all. I still have my 70's Jazz and its a gem, but heavy. The Musicman really can do everything and the quality is top notch.
Dan
 
I have a Sterling HS. I compare it regularly to my five Fenders. (I am a Fender guy, and a passive tone guy). P, J, RBIV, MMV, Aerodyne PJ w EMG's. It sounds better than all of them, and is waaaaay more versatile. My only gripes with it are that it is not nearly as comfortable as the J basses are, and the oiled neck gets pretty filthy.

I generally keep the EQ flat on bass and mid, and boost the treble a bit. It is an extremely powerful EQ, and a little goes a long way.

The strings are pretty dead at the moment. It sounds like a completely different bass, probably more to the liking of those that think of them as too aggressive and zingy.

I have to say that this bass has made me a fan of ceramic magnets, active EQ, and the MM/S pickup scheme. Thanks Big Poppa! :)
 
Am I the only one who doesn't really care for Musicman Basses? I've played Bongo's and Sterling's and Stingray's and haven't been impressed...

I much prefer a Warwick... but at the same time I know alot of people despise them too...

AM I ALONE?

You're probably not alone, but I love 'em. My only beef is they are not 19mm string spacing on the SR5.

They seem to be a "one trick pony" (like my old Alembic) and I seem to demand more from a bass these days.

...and that trick they do, they do so well IMO. I have a pre EB Stingray and I will always have it. I think the EBMM's are great intruments to.

All IMHO and YMMV...:cool: Hey, this is what makes the world go 'round. If it's not for you, it's cool.
 
Am I the only one who doesn't really care for Musicman Basses? I've played Bongo's and Sterling's and Stingray's and haven't been impressed...

I much prefer a Warwick... but at the same time I know alot of people despise them too...


AM I ALONE?

No your not alone however I do find the HH models to be quite awesome. I just dont care for the H models as they tend to sound thin.

I like my Wick a lot more then the EBMM's but thats just my opinion.
 
LOVE the tone. HATE the feel, weight, uneven output from string to string, etc. (Speaking of SR5)

I think they must be hit and miss. Mine is a hit, Strings are even.

The only bass I have is an SR5. However, I love 17mm spacing adn a thin neck. If I wanted a baseball bat in my hand I would ***edit****
Play a warwick or G&L L2500. However the sound of warwick is fantastic.

I would like to say though that I would love to own a Bongo...its just SO DAMN UGLY.

Jonathan
 
I never picked up an EB that I really liked. They're not bad, but I personally would never pay more than 500 for one. I didn't find anything special or extraordinary about the sound or feel. that's just my take on them though.
 
Y'know before they added the neck pickup, I probably never would have had one though.

I pretty much only use positions 4 & 5 on my switch. 5 is the neck pup soloed, and with the right EQ, it gets close to a P, but then you have so much more variation available thru the low & mid knobs. Position 4 is one coil from both pups, that's where the growl comes in.

Both settings sound very deep, rich and textured to my ears.
 
When I play a Stringray, I wish I were 6 inches taller and had much fleshier fingers. They make me feel and sound wimpy. In the right player's hands, they are wonderful, but I can't seem to sound good on one.
 
I have a Sterling HS and I haven't experienced any G-string volume issues. I also have a Thumb BO. The Sterling has a faster neck, but the Warwick outgrunts it.

My Sterling HS and Thumb BO are both very well crafted and both are a joy to play. Playing them is like driving a fine sports car. To each his own, but for me I prefer the MMs and Warwicks over anything I've played from any other brands available at GC.
 
I love the tone of Stingrays when other people use them and I have huge admiration for the Bongos - but I'm seriously uncomfortable playing either of them. I've never tried a Sterling but would like to.

I sure am glad they're out there though for other people to make awesome music on.

(it doesn't help that I'm a neck-pickup kind of guy)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.