• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Anyone tuning at 432hz?

I just shut down a group on Facebook that I'd started a while ago for people whose dogs have a specific rare disease that is very hard to manage. It had gotten to the point where there were so many misinformed people coming to the group and shouting loudly about what they thought to be true. A lot of potential harm involved and I couldn't keep on top of it, it just kept getting worse.

Basically, whoever makes the most noise is winning at this point, regardless of what they actually know. It's ridiculous.

I've spent my life in the biomedical sciences as a researcher and teacher. There's a widespread distrust of modern medicine and science in general that wasn't there 20 or 30 years ago. Back then, it was just a few random whackos. Now, depite the great technological advances we're making, there is subset that is driving us back to the dark ages.
 
Standard is to tune to A = 440hz, but there are several voices saying that we should be tuning to 432hz as was done in the past, to sync all harmonics to the base earth frequency of 8hz.
If anyone is doing it, have you felt any difference? Do you know availabe tuners in the market to tune at 432?

Please, be gentle ;)

I tune to the piano or keyboard player so 440 is what I'm stuck with. But I tune my baby grand piano at 442 and get a rush every time I play because it sounds so sweet.
 
Always tune to the acoustic piano, regardless of what frequency A is at.

With electronic instruments and with most musicians in this century, you can assume that 440 is the standard, so you’ll need to sell the rest of the band on why you want them all to tune to another frequency. Hey, maybe they’ll prefer it, but the burden is on you to convince them to detune.
 
I've spent my life in the biomedical sciences as a researcher and teacher. There's a widespread distrust of modern medicine and science in general that wasn't there 20 or 30 years ago. Back then, it was just a few random whackos. Now, depite the great technological advances we're making, there is subset that is driving us back to the dark ages.

Sounds like my father-in-law, who refuses to wash his hands because "a little dirt is healthy".:meh:
 
  • Like
Reactions: lucianoxrp
I thought about it, researched all kinds of harmonics, measured a lot of stuff, and when you get down to it, "accurate" measurement standards are linked to atomic clocks that can in fact vary. Couple this with all the time dilation from gravitational effects and time becomes a rubber ruler. So play the song at whatever frequency feels good, cuz that's why we're all playing music. :-)
 
432/8=54 times, not octave. One octave equals 2 times, two - 4 times, ... five - 32, six - 64. So 54 times is between 5 and 6 octaves.
And exact tone of lowest A in 432 scale is 13.5 Hz. 8.025 Hz is C.
I see... youre one of those people whom cannot discern humour from context. .. yes yes, nothing to say about the literal-ness of tuning to 8hz?
I bet youre great a parties.
 
I don't think that's irrational. I think it's irrational to expect everyone to buy into that when it's not grounded in science and there's a 440 standard.

It makes sense to downtune by a half step if your singer doesn't have range, but it does make it harder to learn covers. A better solution to that is to find a singer with range and choose songs that they are comfortable with.

I think I'd find it easier to play half a step down than tune down. I know where the notes are more than I remember patterns, it seems. That might explain why I can't sing and play as I'm singing the bass line to myself. I can read text and play, though. Not music as I can't read that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LBS-bass
Standard is to tune to A = 440hz, but there are several voices saying that we should be tuning to 432hz as was done in the past, to sync all harmonics to the base earth frequency of 8hz.
If anyone is doing it, have you felt any difference? Do you know availabe tuners in the market to tune at 432?

Please, be gentle ;)
If there was any advantage in tuning to 432 everyone would. They don’t
 
  • Like
Reactions: Auspuff
This is a very complete article on the history, there was no time such as when people tuned like they did in Atlantis (which was Santorina volcanic atoll) History of Pitch - The Diapason Normal
The theory is absurd, it's as if you were playing in a ship (large cruise ship) and someone said all the songs have to be tuned to the motor pitch. Obviously zones of audible pitch have no contact from any resonant frequency of the earth which would be very very low. (So this all goes in the file for Search For The Brown Note in the Church Of The Sub Genuis)

Only a few mystical pitch theorists are fascist order worshipers, but they did exist in the 20s and 30s in the mystical cults that were supposedly throwbacks to an enlightened era (that didn't exist either).
Pythagoras understood about order within chaos, also check out Lucretius On The Nature Of Things.

Funny you should mention cruise ship motors, BassBrass. Here in Norfolk (UK) I used to play with jazz bands on a river boat called the Vintage Broadsman, which travels from Wroxham a few miles to another 'broad' (large lake), round the broad and comes back. The engine is under a sort of platform-deck at the back, and that was where the band would set up. Fortunately the pitch of the engine does not change no matter how fast or slow the boat is going, or even idling, unlike a car engine. Unfortunately it runs about halfway between F and F#. Fortunately I play fretless ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: BassBrass and Sid s
I think I'd find it easier to play half a step down than tune down. I know where the notes are more than I remember patterns, it seems. That might explain why I can't sing and play as I'm singing the bass line to myself. I can read text and play, though. Not music as I can't read that.

It might explain why, if creating a bass line, I sometimes steal bits of the vocal line at various points.
 
I get what you’re saying...I personally prefer 440 and change key to suit the vocal...just humming along for a bit of annoying hippy fun. It is even more annoying as I play in multiple bands. Three different tunings....still better than working for a living
 

Latest posts