• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Anyone Using Only Micros Now?

Does it count if you downsize to a micro all-tube rig?

IMG_0845_zpscdyihjsj.jpg
 
Nice rig Jimmy! Yes for over a decade. Oh sure I bring a tube rig out once in awhile, (I have several tube rigs) after all they need to be dusted off and played occasionally to keep in fit trim, but for most gigs I have one Rack rig that gets less and less use and four D class rigs to choose from depending on wattage and volume needs. Of course being 64 and having some physical challenges colors my choices as well. I want to gig for another decade or more so I do what needs to be done to facilitate that end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimmyM
I played guitar through same heavy combos in a previous life and vowed not to get caught up in that again. So the switch to bass a few years ago sent me in search of light weight equipment.

I'm using an Ampeg PF-800 and a PF115HE on castors as my primary kit. If I need more volume I drag along the PF115LF on castors as well.
The PF-800, and other odds and ends, is all carried in an old nav bag that I used for carrying my maps, charts, approach plates, and other bumpf before I retired. The reason I've not attached the PF-800 head to the 115HE flip top is due to manageability and weight considerations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seanm
The Tone Hammer 500: ugh...

I'm really looking to understand why this amp is the shizz, maybe I don't get it and need to approach it differently. So correct me if I am wrong, but this is what I hear: the TH500 is kind of built around a dirty, gritty tone. The gain structure seems like it goes into overdrive at the drop of a hat, not even using the DRIVE control. The DRIVE just adds dirt on top of the overdriven Gain.

My problem is that when i get the gain set for a clean dound, I can't get a heck of a lot of volume from the amp. Unless it's just not a loud amp. This is true into both 8 and 4 ohms loads.

The baked-in tone is OK, solid but nothing to write home about. The EQ controls are likewise. so I don't get it...

If this is true, someone is going to have to explain all the hubbub about the Tone Hammer 500. On the strength of peoples' comments and having played through one of the old 750s, I bought one. If ever there was a "meh" amp, the TH500 is it. I mean, it's OK, sounds full, but not very loud nor impressive-sounding for $700. I heard people say it has a tube-like thing, but I disagree about that. The Ampeg PF line does the tube thing way better than the TH. And the Mesa D800 smears the TH500 in every possible way. All of my other Class D amps are better.

So set me straight.


Definitely not the amp for me.
 
good info but, what? no Traynor!!!. Traynor Amps
sb500h_lg.png


500watts, 4lbs, made in Canada, by a old and well respected company(Traynor/Yorkville), kicks butt in power and tone range

and some of those "Ultra Light weights" are 7-8-9 lbs :rollno:
Dude, most of out friends to the south don't have the luxury of having such fabulous products at such awesome prices. I just love my SB500H. I have it paired with an Epafini PS112 at 8ohms. I just wish I could find another one of these cabs. I fact I would trade my Traynor 4 10 4 ohm for one in a heartbeat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: edencab
The Tone Hammer 500: ugh...

I'm really looking to understand why this amp is the shizz, maybe I don't get it and need to approach it differently. So correct me if I am wrong, but this is what I hear: the TH500 is kind of built around a dirty, gritty tone. The gain structure seems like it goes into overdrive at the drop of a hat, not even using the DRIVE control. The DRIVE just adds dirt on top of the overdriven Gain.

My problem is that when i get the gain set for a clean dound, I can't get a heck of a lot of volume from the amp. Unless it's just not a loud amp. This is true into both 8 and 4 ohms loads.

The baked-in tone is OK, solid but nothing to write home about. The EQ controls are likewise. so I don't get it...

If this is true, someone is going to have to explain all the hubbub about the Tone Hammer 500. On the strength of peoples' comments and having played through one of the old 750s, I bought one. If ever there was a "meh" amp, the TH500 is it. I mean, it's OK, sounds full, but not very loud nor impressive-sounding for $700. I heard people say it has a tube-like thing, but I disagree about that. The Ampeg PF line does the tube thing way better than the TH. And the Mesa D800 smears the TH500 in every possible way. All of my other Class D amps are better.

So set me straight.


Definitely not the amp for me.
Yeah. ... you're approachingit wrong and it's not the amp 4 u. I fold I can get as much vol outta it as any 500w D class. .. and sure it'll have a little grit in it at high volumes but keeping the"DRIVE" off... (which is really a HPF & LPF combined) & varying the gain with some sculpting if the mid frequency. .. I can get it loud and pretty clean. But. ..sure. .it does have a baked it tone. I love it. .as many others obviously do. Others don't. It's all good.
 
Yeah. ... you're approachingit wrong and it's not the amp 4 u. I fold I can get as much vol outta it as any 500w D class. .. and sure it'll have a little grit in it at high volumes but keeping the"DRIVE" off... (which is really a HPF & LPF combined) & varying the gain with some sculpting if the mid frequency. .. I can get it loud and pretty clean. But. ..sure. .it does have a baked it tone. I love it. .as many others obviously do. Others don't. It's all good.
I might like the baked-in tone... I like it set flat. the prob is getting a clean tone out of it at a healthy volume without the clip light going on. Or maybe that's the way it is... I don't know. I think it's a quality piece of equipment though.
 
I'm close to being there.

I came home from a long rehearsal last week and had to make the trek from the parking garage to my apartment.

I was beat and had my to carry my bass, GK MBF800, pedalboard, and work computer back with me. The walk itself isn't too bad and takes, maybe, 5 minutes with the elevator ride, but, after practicing for nearly 4 hours, I was ready to pass out.

When I stepped into my living room I saw my gig rig, and I told myself how I happy I was that I didn't have to carry my 50lb head to practice with me. It was at that moment that I also realized that I never wanted to have to carry it again.

It's an amazing head, and it's superior to my GK is many ways, but, man, schlepping that thing is a task in itself. As such, I've decided to only play micros from here on out.

Anyone else have a similar story? Anyone still fighting the good fight with their heavy heads?

Yep. Ditched my stack for a Peavey MiniMax and a Phil Jones C4. Fills up the room with no PA necessary, even with big tube guitar amps and a drum kit to compete with. The only thing I don't like about it is that it sits so low, it's hard to see the tuner and the knobs on the front of the head. But I'm never going back. This rig seriously extended my live-playing career another 10 years, and my next car can be even smaller....