Chrisk-K said:
"Saw a Ray 34 described [in the listing] as excellent. I emailed the seller whether there were dings or scratches on the neck. He wrote me it was in MINT condition.
I received the bass today. At least 7 nicks on the neck. Two biggest nicks are behind the first fret, so my thumb feels them...."
.....move forward with the lessons you've learned, whether that means never buying used again, never using Reverb again, or simply heeding the original listing's details from here on out.
The bass was listed as "excellent", which is not the same thing as "mint", and it's pretty easy to see how a cosmetic blemish that's difficult to even photograph would be easy to miss.
~
It's a tough one this time, because even though the listing designated it as 'excellent', the seller personally called it 'mint' within direct correspondence with the buyer.
Regardless, three things apply.
Sellers should be more careful - what they list, and how accurately and in how much detail that they examine and describe it, and should provide those extra photos WITHOUT BEING ASKED.
Buyers should be more careful - what questions to ask, how many more photos on which to insist, and what chances to take, as well as learning the rules of each middle organization (selling partner) BEFORE BUYING.
Middle organizations which make a commission on the sale (such as Reverb) should be more careful in what rules they make about listings (and do more spot-checking the listings themselves), and I guess this applies to PayPal as well, whether it is an eBay-listed transaction or not, because they are making a cut from the sale too.
Fourth thing is that as long as some selling partners regard 'Mint' condition to mean a different grade than each other, (and GC for example is too lax to refer to 'Mint' in the manner which was reported upthread, IMNSHO), sellers and buyers will occasionally get their signals crossed.
(BTW, I only read 5 1/2 pages of the 15 before posting this.)
~