I told my drummer at the time, "If you ever see me with a rig bigger than this one, it's because I am forced to bring something for a review."![]()
Really! Forced! Ummmm More like forced by curiosity and excitement!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I told my drummer at the time, "If you ever see me with a rig bigger than this one, it's because I am forced to bring something for a review."![]()
Yeah, my gas is ruined by my 33 lb composite Thunderchild 115. I'd love to try a Hathor 112, but can't find a way to justify one. NOTHING this cab can't do.
I think the 1505 will be approximately the same ballpark efficiency as a 1203 stack, but the 1203 stack will ultimately go louder because it will handle more power. I don't really know about my efficiency estimate though, because I haven't seen the T/S parameters for that custom 15" woofer yet.
Yup, that's the way I see it too. The two cabs would each have virtually the same motor... imo we can say that the stack could be used with a kilowatt-class amp.
Thanks!
If all goes according to plan (and at this point there is no indication that it won't), the 1505 will be closer to the 1855 in growliness.
...a 12 that looks like a 10 and a 10 that feels like a 15. IMHO they paired very well. Basically just a huge bottom end presence. Mike says, on his site, that the 110s can be added to just about anything.
Hey, Duke.
I'm quoting an old post here, but I'm curious as to whether there have been any developments on the Hathor 1505 front. I know that the move to Texas has been complicated and, if I remember right, you're still waiting on the 5" driver to be released, so if there's nothing to report just now, feel free to report when there is!
Good luck with the ongoing transitions.
The projections regarding relative efficiency of Hathors 1203 and 15xx seem to have been pretty close, with the latter being about the same efficiency as the twofer stack of 1203s, but with half the power handling of the 1203 stack (one Kappalite motor vs two).
I'm now calling it a "15xx" because I'm going to at least prototype something other than the "1505" configuration... hey I have these weird ideas and gotta try them and see what happens. Don't think that I'm backing away from that new Eminence midrange because I'm not... but it'll probably be early May at the earliest before I can label it with something more definite than "xx".
I would agree that the Tone Hammer is the "anti G-K". It can get rough and dirty in a way that is quite a bit different from the MB series, especially if you push the AGS.
But I would characterize the Aguilar as being more than just a bit retiring in the highs. To my ear, it sounds positively murky in comparison, with something odd, almost veiled in the upper mids.
I think that the TH and MB's are both a little off the beaten path compared to your typical Ampeg fare. I've noticed that there's a lot of polarized, "love it or hate it" opinions about both the Aggies and G-K's.
I personally think of the Aggie as better suited to people who buy the Hathor for its compatibility with distortion pedals, and G-K (especially the Fusion) as better suited to people who like the purity of the TC.
But that's just my opinion. You really need to sample both, to be sure what's going to float your boat.
One thing I will say- AudioKinesis cabs in general, and the Thunderchild series in particular, do two things better than just about any other cab: they bring out all the subtleties of your signal chain, and the smooth response tends to flatter just about anything you plug into them.
Cab matching doesn't get much easier than this...
This is definitely of interest to me as I feel that the 15xx cab will do everything I would need from a cab and while not as modular as 2x 1203 it should be an easy carry. The timing (earliest May to have a proto worked out) is also good for me as I should be in a better position to buy a new cab in the summer.The projections regarding relative efficiency of Hathors 1203 and 15xx seem to have been pretty close, with the latter being about the same efficiency as the twofer stack of 1203s, but with half the power handling of the 1203 stack (one Kappalite motor vs two).
I'm now calling it a "15xx" because I'm going to at least prototype something other than the "1505" configuration... hey I have these weird ideas and gotta try them and see what happens. Don't think that I'm backing away from that new Eminence midrange because I'm not... but it'll probably be early May at the earliest before I can label it with something more definite than "xx".
This is definitely of interest to me as I feel that the 15xx cab will do everything I would need from a cab and while not as modular as 2x 1203 it should be an easy carry. The timing (earliest May to have a proto worked out) is also good for me as I should be in a better position to buy a new cab in the summer.
Is it safe to assume dimensions similar to a TC115 if not a bit shorter in height?
Aww...lucky! (Kicks dirt, pouts, and puts hands in pockets.)I suspect it will be a little taller than a TC115. I'll be sure to post measurements when I receive it (I'm the Beta tester).
The 15xx is 4ohm only then?This is definitely of interest to me as I feel that the 15xx cab will do everything I would need from a cab and while not as modular as 2x 1203 it should be an easy carry.
The 15xx is 4ohm only then?
Awesome! That is what I thought I remember reading...No, it was originally 8 ohms and now it will likely be 8/4 ohm switchable
Hey guys one of my speakon connectors has come unscrewed and is loose on my TC112. I tried screwing it back but the screws just turn and don't tighten. Am I going to have to take the horn out to get to the front of the speakon to tighten it back ? I've never taken a cab apart.
Is it safe to assume dimensions similar to a TC115 if not a bit shorter in height?