• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

AudioKinesis Cabs Part VI...

I have made some tone adjustments to the TH500. I increased the gain and drive and set the mid frequency to around 8 am.
It seems to bring some mid definition without sounding clanky. If I need more mids I can increase the mid level as needed.
Won't know for sure until next practice. Thanks for all the responses on this.
 
I think the Eden will serve you well, I drove 2 410 Goliath III cabs with a WT300 just fine. Switched to Markbass which sounds great with Markbass cabs and my Thunderchild 115, but the Eden ruled with those cabs, wish I had kept it!
 
I had that problem with the prototype for the Thunderchild 112, but the ports were in a different location, way off-center, up behind the horn, so the air-load was asymmetrical. I tend to warn people that it might happen because I don't know for sure that it won't when you plug like one port in the TC112. That being said, I have never heard back from anyone that the problem occurred, which would have been a clicking sound as the voice coil tapped against the side of the magnetic gap inside the motor. Actually it was SpankyPants... ahem, make that Mister SpankyPants... who was the first to detect it, as I recall. I didn't find out what it was until later, when I talked with the great woofer designer Jerry McNutt of Eminence, and he suggested the port configuration that I now use.

To go into a bit more detail, the cone-rocking problem in the Thunderchild 112 prototype arose from a combination of factors. First, the ports were way off to one side of the woofer cone, resulting in a severely asymmetrical air load on the back of the cone at some frequencies (it only happened on some notes, probably related to the suspension system's behavior as well)). Second, the long voice coil of a Kappalite-class woofer doesn't need to be rocked at much of an angle before it taps against the side of the magnetic gap (which is the cylindrical hole through the middle of the magnet where the voice coil resides). Third, the Thunderchild 112 was a smallish box for that woofer, which can handle a LOT of watts, so the result is that it's a very high-internal-pressure box. Those higher pressures exaggerate the effect of the asymmetrical airload.

So after tearing my hair out for several days I called Jerry McNutt and told him about the clicking. He asked me to describe the box configuration, diagnosed the problem, and suggested moving the two ports down so they were symmetrically positioned behind the cone. He suggested placing one port above the other, so that we'd get a little bit of "chimney effect" cooling, as hot air would tend to move out of the upper port, drawing cooler air into the lower port. Fortunately there was just barely enough cabinet depth for the ports + woofer magnet, but the unbraced area of my back panel (there's a horizontal window-pane brace in between woofer and horn) was too small for me to stack the ports vertically (they're flared ports with large diameter outer flanges). So Jerry said to put them on a diagonal, and they fit that way, so that's what I did!

That cone rocking/clicking thing was really traumatic for me because, until I had it solved, my super-cool first bass cab (which was pretty much my only hope to save my company from the Great Recession) had a totally mysterious and totally fatal flaw. So I probably over-reacted to it.
.....
Back to ports for a moment, I've gotten a lot less paranoid about cone rocking because nobody has reported it since I made that change, so the 1553 will have three ports in a clover-leaf pattern centered behind the woofer cone. Plug one, two, or all three... but when you just plug one, maintain the vertical separation. You'd think chuffing would set in as we severely reduce the port cross-sectional area below optimum, but remember we're dropping the tuning frequency at the same time, down into a region where there's not as much energy so we can get away with the reduced port area on a bass cab.
I remember that!! I had no idea that's what led to the addition of the symmetrical porting, though.

People say there's good luck, bad luck, and Brad luck (me). It just goes along with the invariable probability that if I have something, it will break. If you put something in my hands I will somehow find a way to break it (or it will find a way to break itself). But overall, I feel awesome to have contributed to the design of these cabs! *flexes* My Brad luck finally came in handy!

And I am SUPER pumped to finally have a Thunderchild of my own in a few weeks. Does that make me a Thunderparent?
 
I know this is Audiokinesis thread... But i have no idea where to inquire about this. . I have played the TC115 and thought it was FANTASTIC! But then i see thes GB F115s too... so many decisions!
I think deep down low with a Pillow under everything.. Unless its a messy sounding room.. Then i may need to stifle the pillow effect a little. So that alone make me lean more towards the TC115 or TC212

Are the TC and F115 at opposite ends of the spectrum? or more similar?
Im looking for a One Cab move and possibly 4 ohms . .Since i do need to turn up sometimes and dont want to kill my $$$$ cab

Thank you
 
I've had them both. More similar than different. Both great. I like the idea of the tiltback in the F cabs but never used it like that. I preferred the side handles on the TC to the single handle on the F115. 50 or so pounds in a box that size is a little awkward to manage one handed.
 
I am out of town until monday. But i will PM my cell number to you... Too busy today but maybe monday we can talk. .or whenever you have time after that..

I've had them both. More similar than different. Both great. I like the idea of the tiltback in the F cabs but never used it like that. I preferred the side handles on the TC to the single handle on the F115. 50 or so pounds in a box that size is a little awkward to manage one handed.
 
Holy crap! My new ( 12 yr old) Eden WT 550 showed up today and I gave it a bit of a trial run. Couldn't really open her up due to living in an apartment , but from as loud as I could get it I am super impressed through the TC 112. While I have enjoyed the gk 1001 it can almost be too Grindy and I can clearly say it lacks bottom compared to the Eden. Also, talk about the most sensitive and powerful Eq I have ever used in 24 years of bass playing, and the TC eve so faithfully represents the most subtle Eq changes. Thanks for the suggestion guys. I am really amazed at the Eq actually. Most amp eq's just don't seem to do that much to the tone but that is not the case here. Only feature I don't like is the enhance knob as I don't like that super scooped tone, I need midrange attitude.
I am going to put a deposit down on a Hathor so I'll have that tonal pallet available, and I am sure the Hathor/tc112 stack will kill!
 
Hey Duke! Just wants to pop in and give your gear the review of withstanding desert sand and 130 degree temps. The two Hathor 112s have always performed just as expected and never once let me down despite the use and abuse I put them through, top notch build quality rated for even the harsh desert.

On top of that, Mrs Michelle Obama and Conan O'Brien will get to hear your lovely cabs this week as they are putting on a show and we will be the house band for conan's show while he's here. I'll try and snap some pics if I get a chance.
 
Finally did the demo recording of the Birdhaus. I will be sending the cab back to Duke this week. It may take me a few days to put it all together, Gaolee helped me record a number of basses, including an upright, through it. Nothing fancy, recorded it with an Aventone condenser mic into Cubase.
 
This Birdhaus is a 4x8. Don't expect great things from my playing, there's a reason I'm a member of the crappy bassists with expensive gear club. The main point of the demos is to illustrate how the cab responds to different basses. The amp set exactly the same for all of them. It's been a crazy day so I probably won't get to posting them up until tomorrow or Tuesday.
 
This Birdhaus is a 4x8. Don't expect great things from my playing, there's a reason I'm a member of the crappy bassists with expensive gear club. The main point of the demos is to illustrate how the cab responds to different basses. The amp set exactly the same for all of them. It's been a crazy day so I probably won't get to posting them up until tomorrow or Tuesday.
I'd love to hear a 4x10 Birdhaus with those drivers that A.Claber uses in his Two 10 (no tweets)!
 
Okay, hopefully these work. Again, no fancy playing, very basic recording. I think the character of each bass really comes through, however, which goes to show how transparent this cab is.

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

IMG_20151031_204359.jpg