• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

AudioKinesis Cabs Part VI...

I've got some small cabinets that I really enjoy using thanks to how they sound. I built a rack out of 1/2" plywood and covered it in Duratex. The small cabs get placed onto of the rack. The upsides are it gets the cabinet up off the floor and allows me to use a super nice head or pre and power set up.

Once I set level and trim eq in soundcheck I'm on to fuss with other things.
 
As an Amazon Associate, TalkBass may receive commissions from qualifying purchases made via links on this site.
I will check out the tie downs. I have put the rack on my pedal case was looking to see if there was an amp stand or something to make it more accesable.
20160820_161829.jpg
 
Anyone have a solution for using am in a rack case with 12 inch cabs looking for something to keep the rack more stable.

My Thunderchild cab fits underneath this stand quite nicely: WS-540 - Quiklok - Professional Music Equipment and Accessories

But I have found that the shallower SKB racks sit on top plenty securely enough for my playing situations with a small-ish piece of dual density yoga mat foam between the cab and the rack case. It fits inside the case for storage and I added some perforated shelf liner for more grippiness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marial and Snaxster
Anyone have a solution for using am in a rack case with 12 inch cabs looking for something to keep the rack more stable.

IF I have FOH support, AND I'm worried about the stack being unstable, I turn the cab on their sides (stacked) then place the rack (3U) on top of it. It is very stable in that configuration.

Otherwise, as long as the cabs are on a stable surface in a low traffic area, I simply place the rack on the (vertically stacked) cabs with a small towel between them.

I figure my rack is about as stable as a small head. It looks a little scary, but it works fine.
 
Last edited:
I wanted to post for anyone concerned about the roadworthiness of the AudioKinesis cabs.
I have had mine (two 1203s) since September of 2014. They have held up just fine.

When I first got them, I didn't have covers. So, I pulled a couple of thick t-shirts over them for transport. That worked fine, and I never got around to ordering covers. Maybe if I were traveling more, covers might be an option. They have been used for all of my gigs (including several outdoor gigs) and rehearsals and still looks a perform great. I did use my older cabs for one gig that I just knew it was going to rain (but we were spared anyway)!

Oh, and they sound just as good now as when I first got them! :bassist:
 
Thanks for posting those pics Trent.

Just in case anyone is wondering about the relatively thin areas in between the cut-outs on the back panel, each of those areas is reinforced with a solid wood brace (not plywood). I do that in my other cabs as well when there's a relatively thin area in between cut-outs.
 
Nice!!!! Looking forward to hearing a review of that bad boy.

Here was my rig for a short live looping set tonight. The TC500/TC112 sounded excellent. Perhaps I don't need to look into the Mesa... Keeping the Drive knob at zero definitely helps clean things up. The TC112, of course, was stellar and perfect for the venue, a very small theater/performance space.

gigboard1.jpg
gigboard2.jpg
 
Duke,

How does the Hathor 212 compare to your Fantastic 1505?

The two have similar maximum sound pressure levels, but the 212 takes twice as much power to get there. In return, you get a more solid low end, deeper & more impact, with the 212 (two motors instead of just one = more impact). The mids on the 1505 are more aggressive in "growly" mode, and there is a greater difference in voicings between the two midrange settings with the 1505. The 212 goes higher with its pair of 3" mids.

A couple of weeks ago I showed the Hathor 1533 at a GTG in the Dallas area. I mention it here because it figures into the same general ballpark as the two cabs you asked me to compare. The 1533 combines the top end of the 212 (which is of course quite similar to the 1203) with the more growly upper mids of my custom 15" woofer. So in some ways the 1533 sits "in between" the 212 and 1505 as far as voicing goes. Low end of the 1533 is identical to the 1505, but because the more beefy 5" mid allows more overlappage in the crossover region, the 1505 is a bit more aggressive than the 1533 in "growly" mode.

People who own the 1203 have told me that the 1505 (or 1533) has a bigger bottom end. It does seem to sound that way, but actually the 15" Hathor cabs are -4 dB at 64 Hz, while the little 1203 is -3 dB at 64 Hz. The shape of the low-end response curve of the 15" cabs probably averages a bit higher relative to the rest of the spectrum, and my guess is that that accounts for the perception of "big low end" on the 15" cabs.

The 1505 and 1533 have the "4/8 ohm" switch, so they can be set to "8 ohm" mode (at the loss of about 1 dB of efficiency) and safely paralleled with another 8-ohm cab if needed. If you don't need that feature, the switch can be omitted, saving you about a pound in weight.

If there is one area in particular that you'd like for me to go into more detail about, let me know.